<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX - NETSCREEN - WATCHGUARD in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172508#M608064</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think netscreen charges per seat/head for their IPSec client software. Cisco doesn't. So if you are pitching it as a combo firewall/end user vpn solution, you need to price the total deployment cost. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mostiguy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-03-18T14:07:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX - NETSCREEN - WATCHGUARD</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172507#M608063</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know of any concrete benefits of the PIX over these other two firewalls?  I appreciate everyone will go with "the one they know" but are there any differences that I could put forward in the PIX's favour?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers for your time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:37:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172507#M608063</guid>
      <dc:creator>agoodwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:37:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX - NETSCREEN - WATCHGUARD</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172508#M608064</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think netscreen charges per seat/head for their IPSec client software. Cisco doesn't. So if you are pitching it as a combo firewall/end user vpn solution, you need to price the total deployment cost. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172508#M608064</guid>
      <dc:creator>mostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-18T14:07:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX - NETSCREEN - WATCHGUARD</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172509#M608065</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy... just switched last weekend from a Watch Guard FireBox II to a PIX 515E.  I noticed better performance and combined with WebSense, the url filtering is at least 10X better.  The basic VPN client is free and can be downloaded from the Security section on Cisco.  They only charge for the higher encrypytion VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 19:50:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172509#M608065</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-18T19:50:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX - NETSCREEN - WATCHGUARD</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172510#M608066</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks - thats a great one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:39:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172510#M608066</guid>
      <dc:creator>agoodwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-18T21:39:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX - NETSCREEN - WATCHGUARD</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172511#M608067</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I haven't tried the filtering on the watchguard but I will take your experience - thankyou.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:40:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-netscreen-watchguard/m-p/172511#M608067</guid>
      <dc:creator>agoodwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-18T21:40:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

