<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FWSM througput utilization in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-througput-utilization/m-p/1524694#M608115</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can do:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show firewall module 9 traffic .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it's impossible to get more than 6 gigs, since the fwsm is connected to the cat6k backplane via 6x1gig links. so maximum theoretical throughput is 6 Gbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your snmp might be misinterpreting or miscalculating the values properly. better contact support of that 3rd party vendor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that FWSM is rated at 5.5 Gbps not 6:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2706/ps4452/product_data_sheet0900aecd803e69c3.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2706/ps4452/product_data_sheet0900aecd803e69c3.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;however this is under ideal conditions (large packets, udp, minimal features enabled etc..).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;some more info about performance, and tuning the fwsm can be found in another support article:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12668"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12668&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best talk to your cisco sales contact to get more info about performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fadi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fadlouni</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-29T15:04:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM througput utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-througput-utilization/m-p/1524693#M608114</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to monitor the througput on the FWSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a 6509 and the FSWM is seated in slot 9. From the switch I perform the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c06#show etherchannel summary&lt;BR /&gt;Flags:&amp;nbsp; D - down&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; P - bundled in port-channel&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I - stand-alone s - suspended&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; H - Hot-standby (LACP only)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; R - Layer3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; S - Layer2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; U - in use&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; f - failed to allocate aggregator&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; M - not in use, minimum links not met&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; u - unsuitable for bundling&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; w - waiting to be aggregated&lt;BR /&gt;Number of channel-groups in use: 8&lt;BR /&gt;Number of aggregators:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Group&amp;nbsp; Port-channel&amp;nbsp; Protocol&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ports&lt;BR /&gt;------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;278&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Po278(SU)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gi9/1(P)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gi9/2(P)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gi9/3(P)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gi9/4(P)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gi9/5(P)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gi9/6(P)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also perform a show fabric:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fsen-6509-c06#show fabric utilization&lt;BR /&gt; slot&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; channel&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; speed&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ingress %&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Egress %&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 9&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8G&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;c06#show fabric switching-mode&lt;BR /&gt;Global switching mode is Truncated&lt;BR /&gt;dCEF mode is not enforced for system to operate&lt;BR /&gt;Fabric module is not&amp;nbsp; required for system to operate&lt;BR /&gt;Modules are allowed to operate in bus mode&lt;BR /&gt;Truncated mode is allowed, due to presence of CEF720 module&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Module Slot&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Switching Mode&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 9&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Crossbar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c06#show interfaces port-channel 278 counters&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Port&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; InOctets&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; InUcastPkts&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; InMcastPkts&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; InBcastPkts&lt;BR /&gt;Po278&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 268197982372814&amp;nbsp; 533737895426&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10610098&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3908399&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Port&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; OutOctets&amp;nbsp; OutUcastPkts&amp;nbsp; OutMcastPkts&amp;nbsp; OutBcastPkts&lt;BR /&gt;Po278&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 262326947044907&amp;nbsp; 516912071706&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 126901667&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 35732558&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do I get some reasonable output into something like mbit/s or gbit/s from the above output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;The specs on the FWSM is 6 Gbps thoughput but what does this mean. Is it 3 Gbps in each direction?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;I currently have 3rd party software running which is monitoring port-channel 278. On occasion&amp;nbsp; see&amp;nbsp; the sum shoot up over 9 Gbps. How is this possible?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Please clarify how best to determine FWSM throughput.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:00:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-througput-utilization/m-p/1524693#M608114</guid>
      <dc:creator>tommcmahontac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T19:00:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM througput utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-througput-utilization/m-p/1524694#M608115</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can do:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show firewall module 9 traffic .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it's impossible to get more than 6 gigs, since the fwsm is connected to the cat6k backplane via 6x1gig links. so maximum theoretical throughput is 6 Gbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your snmp might be misinterpreting or miscalculating the values properly. better contact support of that 3rd party vendor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that FWSM is rated at 5.5 Gbps not 6:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2706/ps4452/product_data_sheet0900aecd803e69c3.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2706/ps4452/product_data_sheet0900aecd803e69c3.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;however this is under ideal conditions (large packets, udp, minimal features enabled etc..).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;some more info about performance, and tuning the fwsm can be found in another support article:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12668"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12668&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best talk to your cisco sales contact to get more info about performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fadi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-througput-utilization/m-p/1524694#M608115</guid>
      <dc:creator>fadlouni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-29T15:04:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

