<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pix 525 failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-failover/m-p/215477#M610067</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have an UR licence on one, you only need a fail-over licence on the other. Both need not run a UR licence. Or go through the motion of upgrading your image. The hardware and software image, if I am not mistaken, needs to be identical.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope you get sorted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 13:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bvanniekerk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-08-06T13:07:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pix 525 failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-failover/m-p/215475#M610065</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Starting a new project of getting two pix's into a LAN failover.  Been reading all the documentation but I have one quick question if anyone can shed some light on the subject.  The documentation keeps pointing out, that a vlan on a switch is recommended, no problem.  It also keeps pointing out that the hardware has to be the same (it is) and the software on both pix's.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is my question, obviously having UR FOS on both pix's but what is 1 pix has 3DES license and the other doesn't?  Is this going to prevent it from potentially failover correctly.  I would assume yes, and a need to purchase an additional 3DES license for the other pix, correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:32:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-failover/m-p/215475#M610065</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrembetsy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:32:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix 525 failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-failover/m-p/215476#M610066</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failover itself will work fine in the situation you describe above.  The only problem you will see is after a failover occurs, you will not be able to use 3DES to encrypt VPN tunnels (or something along these lines) due to the 2nd PIX not having a 3DES license.  However, with that said, there really is no reason to *not* have a 3DES license on both PIX's as the license is now free.  You can register to receive a new license for the 2nd PIX at the following url:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/sw-center/ciscosecure/pix.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/sw-center/ciscosecure/pix.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Just click on the "*Free* Register for a 3DES/AES IPSec Software Feature Key" link)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 12:15:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-failover/m-p/215476#M610066</guid>
      <dc:creator>scoclayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-05T12:15:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix 525 failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-failover/m-p/215477#M610067</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have an UR licence on one, you only need a fail-over licence on the other. Both need not run a UR licence. Or go through the motion of upgrading your image. The hardware and software image, if I am not mistaken, needs to be identical.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope you get sorted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 13:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-failover/m-p/215477#M610067</guid>
      <dc:creator>bvanniekerk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-06T13:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

