<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX configuration Inside-DMZ without NAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240891#M611504</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 will only allow you for one way communication i.e. from inside-&amp;gt; DMZ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with static (in,out) xxx xxx you can have bi directional communication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nadeem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:49:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nkhawaja</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-10-20T04:49:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX configuration Inside-DMZ without NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240888#M611494</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two PC, one located in a DMZ and other in the inside network. Both must communicate bidirectionally across specific ports, but I want to disable NAT between them since I am handling an administrative application and it does not work with NAT. The DMZ and the inside network, it has different IP addressing Scheme.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R.@.M.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:03:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240888#M611494</guid>
      <dc:creator>ramiro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:03:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX configuration Inside-DMZ without NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240889#M611496</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  You probably want to try&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,dmz) x.x.x.x x.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where x.x.x.x is ip address for pc on inside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;assume y.y.y.y is the ip for pc on dmz, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is no problem from x.x.x.x to access to y.y.y.y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but you do need to add the permission for y.y.y.y to access to x.x.x.x ( access list or conduit ).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this will help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:15:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240889#M611496</guid>
      <dc:creator>tohuang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-20T04:15:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX configuration Inside-DMZ without NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240890#M611500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tony. Thanks for your response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then I do not need to configure " nat (inside 0) "?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R.@.M.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240890#M611500</guid>
      <dc:creator>ramiro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-20T04:34:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX configuration Inside-DMZ without NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240891#M611504</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 will only allow you for one way communication i.e. from inside-&amp;gt; DMZ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with static (in,out) xxx xxx you can have bi directional communication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nadeem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:49:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240891#M611504</guid>
      <dc:creator>nkhawaja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-20T04:49:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX configuration Inside-DMZ without NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240892#M611506</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, I understand. then I might do this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,dmz) 192.168.2.11 192.168.2.11 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Access-list dmz permit tcp host 172.31.4.20 host 192.168.2.11 eq &lt;SERVICE&gt;&lt;/SERVICE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that's right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R.@.M.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 05:09:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240892#M611506</guid>
      <dc:creator>ramiro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-20T05:09:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX configuration Inside-DMZ without NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240893#M611507</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Yes, that is correct. However, you pretty much have to apply this list to dmz interface. Remember that, there is always " deny ip any any " at the end of every access list.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which will deny the traffic going from dmz to outside. You want to be careful about this. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  If you are not using PDM, since this is non-routable address, you can also use conduit statement. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2003 05:13:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-configuration-inside-dmz-without-nat/m-p/240893#M611507</guid>
      <dc:creator>tohuang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-21T05:13:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

