<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: firewall nat in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570084#M612059</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it will work, however, please be advised that it is only for outbound connection. If you need both, then you would need to configure static NAT statement:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (local,Internet-facing) 210.19.56.73 192.168.100.10 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the global statement should be as follows if you want to configure nat/global pair:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (Internet-facing) 4&amp;nbsp; 210.19.56.73&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:31:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-09T01:31:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>firewall nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570082#M612057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;this ASA has existing basic nat rule ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; global (Internet-facing) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; nat (local) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Public interface ip is 210.19.56.71&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now, if we want to have different nat for only a single user using a different public IP. how can this be done , so it also doesnt affect other users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eg, this single user has 192.168.100.10 IP and other public ip is 210.19.56.73.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will it work alongwith existing rule, if it is configured following way-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; global (Internet-facing) 4 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; nat (local) 4 192.168.100.10 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help.Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:37:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570082#M612057</guid>
      <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T18:37:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570083#M612058</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can use a different global pool and a different IP for that. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (Internet-facing) 4 210.19.56.73&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (local) 4 192.168.100.10 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will ensure that host 192.168.100.10 will use .73 address when going to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570083#M612058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nagaraja Thanthry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-09T01:28:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570084#M612059</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it will work, however, please be advised that it is only for outbound connection. If you need both, then you would need to configure static NAT statement:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (local,Internet-facing) 210.19.56.73 192.168.100.10 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the global statement should be as follows if you want to configure nat/global pair:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (Internet-facing) 4&amp;nbsp; 210.19.56.73&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:31:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570084#M612059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-09T01:31:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570085#M612060</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Halijenn,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think when it comes to dynamic NAT, the best match is considered not the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/cfgna&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;t.html#wp1042696&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570085#M612060</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nagaraja Thanthry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-09T01:36:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570086#M612061</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NT is correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NAT ORDER OF OPERATIONS&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The rules are tried in order.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1) nat 0 access-list (nat-exempt)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2) match against existing xlates&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3) static&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; a) static nat with and without access-list (first match)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; b) static pat with and without access-list (first match)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4) nat&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; a) nat &lt;ID&gt; access-list (first match)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Note: nat 0 access-list is not part of this command.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; b) nat &lt;ID&gt; &lt;ADDRESS&gt; &lt;MASK&gt; (best match)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Note:&amp;nbsp; When choosing a global address from multiple pools with&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; the same nat id, the following order is tried&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; i) if the id is 0, create an identity xlate.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ii) use the global pool for dynamic NAT&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; iii) use the global pool for dynamic PAT&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5) Error&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-KS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/MASK&gt;&lt;/ADDRESS&gt;&lt;/ID&gt;&lt;/ID&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:39:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570086#M612061</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kureli Sankar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-09T01:39:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570087#M612062</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Kusankar, NT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've updated my previous post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:59:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570087#M612062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-09T01:59:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570088#M612063</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;does that mean if : global (Internet-facing) 1 interface &amp;amp; nat (local) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 is before global (Internet-facing) 4 interface &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp; nat (local) 4 192.168.100.10 255.255.255.255 ; the host 192.168.100.10 might use nat1 instead of nat4 based on order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if so, will i have to reverse the order? &amp;amp; how to arrange in that sequence if nat 1 already exists.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please correct if this is wrong.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:03:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570088#M612063</guid>
      <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-09T02:03:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firewall nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570089#M612064</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as your NAT statement is specific to a host, order does not matter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can leave t the way it is right now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:06:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-nat/m-p/1570089#M612064</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nagaraja Thanthry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-09T02:06:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

