<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Pix security level 0 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-security-level-0/m-p/140460#M612873</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Are there any known issues with having 2 interfaces with security level 0???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:55:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mathia5</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:55:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pix security level 0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-security-level-0/m-p/140460#M612873</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are there any known issues with having 2 interfaces with security level 0???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:55:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-security-level-0/m-p/140460#M612873</guid>
      <dc:creator>mathia5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:55:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix security level 0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-security-level-0/m-p/140461#M612874</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is an unsupported configuration - whether it works or not, if you ever need to open a support case with the TAC, they can tell you you are out of luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-security-level-0/m-p/140461#M612874</guid>
      <dc:creator>mostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-11T14:56:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix security level 0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-security-level-0/m-p/140462#M612875</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the command reference (v6.3) you can find this comment when you look at the 'nameif' command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Interfaces with the same security level cannot communicate with each other. We recommend that every interface have a unique security level." &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Cisco Press I read a few months ago, they said it was not a TAC supported config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-security-level-0/m-p/140462#M612875</guid>
      <dc:creator>tvanginneken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-11T14:58:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix security level 0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-security-level-0/m-p/140463#M612877</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PIX will not accept two interfaces with securitylevel 0 because securitylevel 0 is reserved for the interface named outside (case sensitive)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can however configure two interfaces with securitylevel 1 and then the default behaviour of this can be found on the link Tom allready provided&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Leo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 05:58:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-security-level-0/m-p/140463#M612877</guid>
      <dc:creator>l.mourits</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-12T05:58:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

