<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Security Context in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510857#M613068</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The answer is no, and please educate the customer that Active/Active does not mean traffic is load balanced between 2 ASAs automatically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Supported&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;: Active/Active means that the customer can direct their traffic into 2 for example: subnet 10.1.1.0/24 to be routed through ASA-1 (which hosts context-1), and subnet 10.1.2.0/24 to be routed through ASA-2 (which hosts context-2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Not Supported&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;: What Active/Active can't do is route both 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24 through something like VRRP address and ASA dynamically load balance the traffic between the 2 firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:53:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-31T12:53:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510851#M613060</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Dears,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question-1:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Can we have a 2 ASA Active Active in single mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Answer: &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I know about context is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question-2: &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;If we have 2 ASA with Context-A and Context-B,then ASA-1 will be active for Context-A and standby for Context-B, For ASA-2 Context-B wil&amp;nbsp; be Active and ASA-1 will be standby. Please correct me if i m wrong???????????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Answer: &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:32:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510851#M613060</guid>
      <dc:creator>estelamathew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T18:32:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510852#M613061</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question-1: No, ASA needs to be in multiple context mode to support more than one context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question-2: Yes, you can configure that both context A and B to be active on ASA-1, or alternatively you can configure context A to be active on ASA-1 and context B to be active on ASA-2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that answers your questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510852#M613061</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T05:51:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510853#M613062</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can certainly have multiple contexts being active on a single firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The failover pair is just for redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a useful link on configuring multiple context firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://cisco.biz/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_exa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mple09186a00808d2b63.shtml&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:51:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510853#M613062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nagaraja Thanthry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T05:51:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510854#M613063</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Dears,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In single customer do we need to create Multiple context????? . As i m sure we don't need but if so i want, then can i communicate between context's.suppose If i m creating context in single customer that means i m seperating subnets vlan's of the customer??? please correct me if i m wrong???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:08:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510854#M613063</guid>
      <dc:creator>estelamathew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T06:08:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510855#M613064</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Definitely need to be in multi context mode before you can configure any context within an ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It requires a reboot when you change the ASA from single to multi context mode, and to run Active-Active failover, the ASA needs to be in multi context mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510855#M613064</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T08:53:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510856#M613066</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Halijenn,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I m planning to configure ASA for 1 customer,and he is insisting to configure in multiple context mode so that he can achieve Active Active session from the firewall. ASA dedicated to 1 customer do we really need to create multiple context &lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000; "&gt;within&lt;/STRONG&gt; that customer????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;USER GUIDE SAYS:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Multiple security contexts in the following situations: Please answer the question below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;• You are a service provider and want to sell security services to many customers. By enabling&lt;BR /&gt;multiple security contexts on the security appliance, you can implement a cost-effective,&lt;BR /&gt;space-saving solution that keeps all customer traffic separate and secure, and also eases&lt;BR /&gt;configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000; "&gt;OK,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;• You are a large enterprise or a college campus and want to keep departments completely separate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000; "&gt;Answer&lt;/STRONG&gt;: when Department don't want to speak to each other,,please correct me if i m wrong.????? If the department want to coummnicate then we would have created?????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;• You are an enterprise that wants to provide distinct security policies to different departments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000; "&gt;Answer&lt;/STRONG&gt;: ??????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;• You have any network that requires more than one security appliance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000; "&gt;Answer&lt;/STRONG&gt;: what can be this situation.?????????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510856#M613066</guid>
      <dc:creator>estelamathew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T11:48:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510857#M613068</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The answer is no, and please educate the customer that Active/Active does not mean traffic is load balanced between 2 ASAs automatically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Supported&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;: Active/Active means that the customer can direct their traffic into 2 for example: subnet 10.1.1.0/24 to be routed through ASA-1 (which hosts context-1), and subnet 10.1.2.0/24 to be routed through ASA-2 (which hosts context-2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Not Supported&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;: What Active/Active can't do is route both 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24 through something like VRRP address and ASA dynamically load balance the traffic between the 2 firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:53:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510857#M613068</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T12:53:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510858#M613070</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;halijenn wrote:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The answer is no, and please educate the customer that Active/Active does not mean traffic is load balanced between 2 ASAs automatically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Supported&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;: Active/Active means that the customer can direct their traffic into 2 for example: subnet 10.1.1.0/24 to be routed through ASA-1 (which hosts context-1), and subnet 10.1.2.0/24 to be routed through ASA-2 (which hosts context-2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Not Supported&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;: What Active/Active can't do is route both 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24 through something like VRRP address and ASA dynamically load balance the traffic between the 2 firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for ur precious help,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please find the attached,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have to manually load balance the traffic to ASA-1 OR ASA-2 if we are creating a context's as per the attached diagram. correct me if i m wrong????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000; "&gt;Can't understood perfectly the below lines can u explore more???????&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Not Supported&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;:&amp;nbsp; What Active/Active can't do is route both 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24&amp;nbsp; through something like VRRP address and ASA dynamically load balance the&amp;nbsp; traffic between the 2 firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ANSWER:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510858#M613070</guid>
      <dc:creator>estelamathew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T22:16:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510859#M613071</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Estela,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the .png attachment.&amp;nbsp; What halijenn said as not supportes is this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Context 1 can only process traffic from and to 10.1.1.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Context 2 can only process traffic from and to 10.1.2.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or they can switch roles and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Context 1 can process traffic from and to 10.1.2.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Context 2 can process traffic from and to 10.1.1.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;at no time can both contexts process traffic for both 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;act/act failover can only load balance PER CONTEXT basis and not load balance over all traffic. Is this clear? If not pls. post your question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-KS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:04:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510859#M613071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kureli Sankar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-01T00:04:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510860#M613072</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Halijenn/Kusankar,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for Exploring the &lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000; "&gt;Answer:2 NOT SUPPORTED&lt;/STRONG&gt;,it is very much clear to me now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;For Answer 1 SUPPORTED&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; :Is the below statement correct ???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have to manually direct the traffic to ASA-1 OR ASA-2 if we are&amp;nbsp; creating a context's as per the attached diagram in my previous mail. Correct me if i m&amp;nbsp; wrong????.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:43:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510860#M613072</guid>
      <dc:creator>estelamathew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-01T04:43:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Context</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510861#M613073</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, you are absolutely correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-context/m-p/1510861#M613073</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-01T04:46:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

