<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX 520 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-520/m-p/262874#M614710</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think so ... Could you kindly let me know if you come across any...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 06:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nikhil_m</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-12-02T06:55:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX 520</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-520/m-p/262873#M614696</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a way I can force all SMTP traffic out a specific ip adderess and continue firewall integrity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:07:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-520/m-p/262873#M614696</guid>
      <dc:creator>dconstantino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T07:07:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 520</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-520/m-p/262874#M614710</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think so ... Could you kindly let me know if you come across any...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 06:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-520/m-p/262874#M614710</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhil_m</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-02T06:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

