<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NT browsing through PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nt-browsing-through-pix/m-p/162883#M615216</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having some problems browsing my Windows networks through a PIX.  Here's the scenario: I used to have all of my vlans connected to an RSM on a 5500 switch.  On Saturday morning I shut down all of the RSM interfaces and inserted a PIX (with vlans configured) between all of my vlans.  I'm having a problem now browsing my Windows networks.  Will the PIX allow me to browse Windows networks across logical and/or physical interfaces?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>r.crist</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:56:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NT browsing through PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nt-browsing-through-pix/m-p/162883#M615216</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having some problems browsing my Windows networks through a PIX.  Here's the scenario: I used to have all of my vlans connected to an RSM on a 5500 switch.  On Saturday morning I shut down all of the RSM interfaces and inserted a PIX (with vlans configured) between all of my vlans.  I'm having a problem now browsing my Windows networks.  Will the PIX allow me to browse Windows networks across logical and/or physical interfaces?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nt-browsing-through-pix/m-p/162883#M615216</guid>
      <dc:creator>r.crist</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:56:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NT browsing through PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nt-browsing-through-pix/m-p/162884#M615218</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you open enough ports, sure, which somewhat defeats the purpose of having the segments firewalled (note, that it is perfectly legitimate to use a pix like you are, with all the MS stuff open between the pix's interfaces, and just use the pix to block other stuff - management/monitoring apps, etc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will want tcp/udp 135 open, as well as tcp/udp 137-139, and tcp/udp 445 at a minimum. Win2k active directory will neep tcp/udp 88 for kerberos. If you are running wins, it uses 1512tcp and udp for replication between servers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is a start. That should work for NT 4, win2k AD might need some more ports opened, depending on topology&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:56:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nt-browsing-through-pix/m-p/162884#M615218</guid>
      <dc:creator>mostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-18T18:56:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

