<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX Setup Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-setup-question/m-p/185086#M616739</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;static forwarding should not stop the vpn from working. What precisely is the static command you are trying to use? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is sounds like the proxy server might have a problem, or perhaps your bandwidth utilization is high. PIXen really don't get involved in http traffic unless you have websense/n2h2 filtering enabled, or have java/activex blocking. Have you checked your connection counts on the pix? What model do you have? How many users use the proxy server?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mostiguy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-06-23T18:30:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX Setup Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-setup-question/m-p/185085#M616733</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there anything wrong with this setup.  I have two legal ip addresses. One for the router and one for the external int of the pix.  I need to have a nat 1 command for the entire internal network (this is not used yet but is setup).  I need a static for the mail/www server "static (inside,outside) interface 10.0.0.2" so to speak.  I need to allow in www,443 and 25 to this interface.  I also need to allow microsoft vpn and cisco vpn.  I have realised that I cannot create the above static as it stops the vpn from working so I have created 3 "static (inside,outside) interface 25 10.0.0.2 25" commands and then bound the access-list to the external interface.  It all works but I am finding that internet on the desktops (that is via the proxy server 10.0.0.2) is seeming to hang every now and again - you can browse into a web page to about 4 layers and then nothing happens. If you close and reopen IE it works fine again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Im pretty sure the clients are ok as this setup was just a static for the 10.0.0.2 machine (no vpn, nat and inbound ports) before and all worked fine,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would appreciate any idea's anyone has&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your time&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:48:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-setup-question/m-p/185085#M616733</guid>
      <dc:creator>agoodwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:48:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Setup Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-setup-question/m-p/185086#M616739</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;static forwarding should not stop the vpn from working. What precisely is the static command you are trying to use? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is sounds like the proxy server might have a problem, or perhaps your bandwidth utilization is high. PIXen really don't get involved in http traffic unless you have websense/n2h2 filtering enabled, or have java/activex blocking. Have you checked your connection counts on the pix? What model do you have? How many users use the proxy server?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-setup-question/m-p/185086#M616739</guid>
      <dc:creator>mostiguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-23T18:30:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Setup Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-setup-question/m-p/185087#M616811</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside)1 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 1.1.1.1 25 10.0.0.2 25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 1.1.1.1 80 10.0.0.2 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 1.1.1.1 443 10.0.0.2 443&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 101 permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq smtp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 101 permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq http&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 101 permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 443&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group 101 in interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;plus settings to allow pptp and cisco client to connect on 1.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It all works including the vpn (apologies if I have written it down wrong as its from the top of my head but you get the idea)  I was just wondering whether there was something strange happening with the nat command maybe?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is just www browsing appears to timeout or something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-setup-question/m-p/185087#M616811</guid>
      <dc:creator>agoodwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-23T20:01:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

