<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAT / Routing on PIX 515 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-routing-on-pix-515/m-p/188278#M617617</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmm, difficult to say, you could do it on either, and it's probably much of a muchness which way you end up doing it.  I'd probably do it on the router since you have a private IP address on the PIX.  On the router you'd just do (assuming your inside network is 10.1.1.0/24):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.1 200.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.......&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.10 200.1.1.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat pool ippool 150.1.1.1 150.1.1.254 prefix-length 24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat inside source list 100 pool ippool overload&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 100 permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and then on the PIX just do:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2003 00:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gfullage</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-01-24T00:35:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT / Routing on PIX 515</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-routing-on-pix-515/m-p/188277#M617607</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a 2620 connected to 2 ISPs on the outside of my pix - i have 10 users that must be static NAT to point to one ISP and the rest will be NAT from a pool pointing to the other ISP.  I would like to keep the outside interface of the PIX a private IP.  I am leaning towards creating a route-map with ACL to direct the traffic accordingly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should I NAT on the PIX or router or both?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:30:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-routing-on-pix-515/m-p/188277#M617607</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdagostino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:30:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT / Routing on PIX 515</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-routing-on-pix-515/m-p/188278#M617617</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmm, difficult to say, you could do it on either, and it's probably much of a muchness which way you end up doing it.  I'd probably do it on the router since you have a private IP address on the PIX.  On the router you'd just do (assuming your inside network is 10.1.1.0/24):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.1 200.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.......&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.10 200.1.1.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat pool ippool 150.1.1.1 150.1.1.254 prefix-length 24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat inside source list 100 pool ippool overload&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 100 permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and then on the PIX just do:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2003 00:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-routing-on-pix-515/m-p/188278#M617617</guid>
      <dc:creator>gfullage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-24T00:35:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT / Routing on PIX 515</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-routing-on-pix-515/m-p/188279#M617629</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply, but what is the need for the static on the PIX?  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2003 01:15:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-routing-on-pix-515/m-p/188279#M617629</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdagostino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-24T01:15:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

