<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX Design Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-design-question/m-p/167204#M618233</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The phrase multi-tiered DMZ doesn't really ring a bell. I don't remember coming accross such a term or having read about such setups and that would translate to only one thing, tougher troubleshooting. I would definately recommend going in for a design similar to what you are likely to see deployed commonly. That would not only help while troubleshooting but also help since a wealth of documentation is likely to be available. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:30:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thomas.chen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-12-16T22:30:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX Design Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-design-question/m-p/167203#M618208</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a situation where I utilize CacheFlow devices to serve up web content for a high traffic web site.  In considering new secure architecture - I have two options, creating two seperate DMZ segments - one for the redundant CacheFlows and another that contains the physical web servers.  The other option is creating one multi-tiered DMZ segment that utilizes another PIX between the CacheFlow segment (Outside) to the segment  (Inside) where the physical web servers reside.  From a security perspective, what are some of the advantages/drawbacks of each design.  Thanks for any help that you provide.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-design-question/m-p/167203#M618208</guid>
      <dc:creator>rm2017</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:25:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Design Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-design-question/m-p/167204#M618233</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The phrase multi-tiered DMZ doesn't really ring a bell. I don't remember coming accross such a term or having read about such setups and that would translate to only one thing, tougher troubleshooting. I would definately recommend going in for a design similar to what you are likely to see deployed commonly. That would not only help while troubleshooting but also help since a wealth of documentation is likely to be available. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:30:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-design-question/m-p/167204#M618233</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas.chen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-12-16T22:30:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

