<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX 501 Port Segmentation for teleworkers? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-port-segmentation-for-teleworkers/m-p/203781#M620873</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ah, yes. this is much better. Thank you Sensei.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:55:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>r-lemaster</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-06-30T00:55:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX 501 Port Segmentation for teleworkers?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-port-segmentation-for-teleworkers/m-p/203779#M620871</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We're evaluating PIX vs. Netscreen &amp;amp; SonicWALL for teleworkers. Both&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SonicWALL and Netscreen offer a port segmentation feature that allows the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;corporate VPN to be extended to only specific ports. This means that Mom or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dad can be on the company VPN, but anyone else on that home network (kids)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;won't be able to access the corporate VPN. Does Cisco offer such a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;feature or VLAN functionality, or do we have to use a Netscreen or SonicWALL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;firewall for home users?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:49:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-port-segmentation-for-teleworkers/m-p/203779#M620871</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-lemaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:49:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 Port Segmentation for teleworkers?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-port-segmentation-for-teleworkers/m-p/203780#M620872</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure, the Pix can offer similar functionality - but even better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How about authenticating each user as they attempt to cross the tunnel?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;User Level Authentication is a feature in 6.3 Pix OS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/63rnotes/pixrn63.htm#67805" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/63rnotes/pixrn63.htm#67805&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is more secure then simply letting unauthorized users simply move from one port to another on the Netscreen or Sonicwall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2003 16:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-port-segmentation-for-teleworkers/m-p/203780#M620872</guid>
      <dc:creator>pcomeaux</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-29T16:42:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 Port Segmentation for teleworkers?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-port-segmentation-for-teleworkers/m-p/203781#M620873</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ah, yes. this is much better. Thank you Sensei.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:55:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-port-segmentation-for-teleworkers/m-p/203781#M620873</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-lemaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-30T00:55:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

