<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic lan-based failover on PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lan-based-failover-on-pix/m-p/16019#M623131</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am planning to use lan-based failover on PIX, but am wondering if it really works well or not. If anyone has the experience with this technology, please let me know how the implementation goes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:18:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shwumiin.yang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:18:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>lan-based failover on PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lan-based-failover-on-pix/m-p/16019#M623131</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am planning to use lan-based failover on PIX, but am wondering if it really works well or not. If anyone has the experience with this technology, please let me know how the implementation goes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:18:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lan-based-failover-on-pix/m-p/16019#M623131</guid>
      <dc:creator>shwumiin.yang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:18:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lan-based failover on PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lan-based-failover-on-pix/m-p/16020#M623140</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I´m using stateful LAN-based failover with PIX 515E Failover bundels.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a couple of installations with this configuration and they all run well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The LAN-based failover link is on a separete VLAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have to use PIX 6.2x software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_62/config/failover.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_62/config/failover.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards /Marie&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lan-based-failover-on-pix/m-p/16020#M623140</guid>
      <dc:creator>m.lundgren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-10-21T06:18:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lan-based failover on PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lan-based-failover-on-pix/m-p/16021#M623147</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much. It makes me feel more comfortable now. However, I am wondering how you tested the failover situation if you don't mind letting me know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, I am planning to use two seperate switches connected to primary PIX and secondary PIX, repectively, and trunk this VLAN between these two switches for lan-based failover. Same for stateful failover link but in a different VLAN. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shwu-miin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lan-based-failover-on-pix/m-p/16021#M623147</guid>
      <dc:creator>shwumiin.yang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-10-21T11:52:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

