topic security on pix using nat 0 in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-on-pix-using-nat-0/m-p/79188#M627652 <P>how secure is a network if u have the public ip on the INSIDE and thereby using the nat 0 command for them to be visible outside...is there any security issue on this as compared to having the public ip outside and using the nat x command to translate the inside address to outside addresses?</P><P></P><P>thx</P><P></P> Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:09:48 GMT rpalacio 2020-02-21T06:09:48Z security on pix using nat 0 https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-on-pix-using-nat-0/m-p/79188#M627652 <P>how secure is a network if u have the public ip on the INSIDE and thereby using the nat 0 command for them to be visible outside...is there any security issue on this as compared to having the public ip outside and using the nat x command to translate the inside address to outside addresses?</P><P></P><P>thx</P><P></P> Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:09:48 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-on-pix-using-nat-0/m-p/79188#M627652 rpalacio 2020-02-21T06:09:48Z Re: security on pix using nat 0 https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-on-pix-using-nat-0/m-p/79189#M627670 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>The security is not changed by using nat 0. For outside to see inside, you still need to define either a conduit or access-list.</P><P>Regards,</P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 17 Jul 2002 05:00:52 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/security-on-pix-using-nat-0/m-p/79189#M627670 edadios 2002-07-17T05:00:52Z