<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Design Question Pix, Web and SQL back end in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/design-question-pix-web-and-sql-back-end/m-p/140668#M629525</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many designs out there recommend connecting sql backends through a seperate dmz. Here is an excellent document from Cisco: "SAFE: A Security Blueprint for Enterprise Networks"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns110/ns129/ns131/ns128/networking_solutions_implementation_white_paper09186a008009c8b6.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns110/ns129/ns131/ns128/networking_solutions_implementation_white_paper09186a008009c8b6.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hth,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mustafa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2003 18:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mhussein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-04-07T18:00:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Design Question Pix, Web and SQL back end</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/design-question-pix-web-and-sql-back-end/m-p/140667#M629504</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am looking at the design for a web site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently I am looking at a pair of perimeter routers,  connecting through a pair of 2950's to a Failover pair of Pix's.  These connect via a pair of 2950's on the internal network to a tollerant CSS11506 content switch.  The Web servers are Multi Honed into the CSS11506.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I then need to connect a back end SQL cluster that handles the content into the network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I better connecting this through it's own firewall or through a DMZ on the Internet PIX.  If it goes through it's own firewall I will use a failover pair of Pix 525.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any assistance will be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:40:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/design-question-pix-web-and-sql-back-end/m-p/140667#M629504</guid>
      <dc:creator>bbcornwall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:40:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design Question Pix, Web and SQL back end</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/design-question-pix-web-and-sql-back-end/m-p/140668#M629525</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many designs out there recommend connecting sql backends through a seperate dmz. Here is an excellent document from Cisco: "SAFE: A Security Blueprint for Enterprise Networks"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns110/ns129/ns131/ns128/networking_solutions_implementation_white_paper09186a008009c8b6.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns110/ns129/ns131/ns128/networking_solutions_implementation_white_paper09186a008009c8b6.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hth,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mustafa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2003 18:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/design-question-pix-web-and-sql-back-end/m-p/140668#M629525</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhussein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-07T18:00:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

