<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Creating a discontiguous addresses as one Logical Object on a PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/creating-a-discontiguous-addresses-as-one-logical-object-on-a/m-p/58889#M644475</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you create one logical object consisting of several different discontiguous subnets for ACL configuration on a PIX (like on raptor or checkpoint) ?  Currently I am summarising and organising address blocks in an attempt to stop my rule list from not be too excessive.  Does anyone know an easier way?? [&lt;A href="mailto:nicholas.sheridan@aig.com" target="_blank"&gt;nicholas.sheridan@aig.com&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nsheridan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:06:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Creating a discontiguous addresses as one Logical Object on a PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/creating-a-discontiguous-addresses-as-one-logical-object-on-a/m-p/58889#M644475</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you create one logical object consisting of several different discontiguous subnets for ACL configuration on a PIX (like on raptor or checkpoint) ?  Currently I am summarising and organising address blocks in an attempt to stop my rule list from not be too excessive.  Does anyone know an easier way?? [&lt;A href="mailto:nicholas.sheridan@aig.com" target="_blank"&gt;nicholas.sheridan@aig.com&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/creating-a-discontiguous-addresses-as-one-logical-object-on-a/m-p/58889#M644475</guid>
      <dc:creator>nsheridan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creating a discontiguous addresses as one Logical Object on</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/creating-a-discontiguous-addresses-as-one-logical-object-on-a/m-p/58890#M644508</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is exactly the new feature introduced in 6.2 OS, check the release notes ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2002 01:24:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/creating-a-discontiguous-addresses-as-one-logical-object-on-a/m-p/58890#M644508</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhussein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-22T01:24:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creating a discontiguous addresses as one Logical Object on</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/creating-a-discontiguous-addresses-as-one-logical-object-on-a/m-p/58891#M644531</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Superb, thanks for posting the message!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:36:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/creating-a-discontiguous-addresses-as-one-logical-object-on-a/m-p/58891#M644531</guid>
      <dc:creator>nsheridan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-25T09:36:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

