<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Effect of NAT using PIXes on NTP in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/effect-of-nat-using-pixes-on-ntp/m-p/1480483#M652515</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks but the data sheet does not indicate what the latency or jitter of a loaded PIX performing NAT is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect the only way to tell is empirically by trying it out and let the physicists monitor the service.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:30:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GrumpyBear</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-16T13:30:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Effect of NAT using PIXes on NTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/effect-of-nat-using-pixes-on-ntp/m-p/1480480#M652512</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a couple of Stratum 2 NTP servers I have to move out to our DMZ.&amp;nbsp; My problem is that the IP addresses they use are very well known and hard coded in appliances by many manufacturers.&amp;nbsp; Futher complicating matters the subnets they reside upon are still in use by other hosts that have to remain inside our production network and will not be readdressed for a while.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In an ideal world I would simply readdress these servers into our DMZ address space then simply NAT the legacy addresses.&amp;nbsp; The DMZ firewalls are currently PIX 525s (they will be upgraded to ASA5580s later next quarter but I have to get all the stuff out to the DMZ first).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As these are running NTP the question is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do PIXes NAT in Hardware?&amp;nbsp; If not, we are concerned that processes on the control plane may cause variations in latency (i.e. jitter) that may affect the accuracy of the time reference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These servers have a quiescent load of 40,000 sessions per hour and spike to loads in excess of 200,000 sessions per hour at times.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:25:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/effect-of-nat-using-pixes-on-ntp/m-p/1480480#M652512</guid>
      <dc:creator>GrumpyBear</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T18:25:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Effect of NAT using PIXes on NTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/effect-of-nat-using-pixes-on-ntp/m-p/1480481#M652513</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NAT always happens at cpu. We have not seen any issues with NTP server behind natted address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- AD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/effect-of-nat-using-pixes-on-ntp/m-p/1480481#M652513</guid>
      <dc:creator>andhingr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-14T00:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Effect of NAT using PIXes on NTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/effect-of-nat-using-pixes-on-ntp/m-p/1480482#M652514</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NAT on PIX or ASA is not processed by the hardware, however, it should be capable of doing 200,000 NTP sessions per hour.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the datasheet for PIX525 for your reference on what it could handle:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5708/ps5709/ps2030/ps2118/product_data_sheet09186a0080091b09.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5708/ps5709/ps2030/ps2118/product_data_sheet09186a0080091b09.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/effect-of-nat-using-pixes-on-ntp/m-p/1480482#M652514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-14T00:12:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Effect of NAT using PIXes on NTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/effect-of-nat-using-pixes-on-ntp/m-p/1480483#M652515</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks but the data sheet does not indicate what the latency or jitter of a loaded PIX performing NAT is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect the only way to tell is empirically by trying it out and let the physicists monitor the service.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:30:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/effect-of-nat-using-pixes-on-ntp/m-p/1480483#M652515</guid>
      <dc:creator>GrumpyBear</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-16T13:30:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

