<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Does PIX destination static Nat in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/does-pix-destination-static-nat/m-p/79290#M656416</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a webpage detailing the new features in 6.2? Or a proper release date?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:49:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>davecs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-04-15T12:49:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does PIX destination static Nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/does-pix-destination-static-nat/m-p/79288#M656414</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does PIX can only source static NAT or destination static too. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Situation is that costumer networks use the same subnets which should translated like on routers with inside local-global and outside local-global to hide the real addresses of both sides, is this poosible with a PIX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:00:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/does-pix-destination-static-nat/m-p/79288#M656414</guid>
      <dc:creator>andre.frost</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:00:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does PIX destination static Nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/does-pix-destination-static-nat/m-p/79289#M656415</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This feature is also known as Outside NAT (or Bi-directional NAT), and will be available in PIX version 6.2 due out in a couple of weeks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:48:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/does-pix-destination-static-nat/m-p/79289#M656415</guid>
      <dc:creator>David White</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-04-01T16:48:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does PIX destination static Nat</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/does-pix-destination-static-nat/m-p/79290#M656416</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a webpage detailing the new features in 6.2? Or a proper release date?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:49:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/does-pix-destination-static-nat/m-p/79290#M656416</guid>
      <dc:creator>davecs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-04-15T12:49:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

