<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Re : FWSM failover Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/re-fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1487451#M660253</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Magnus &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SN -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:20:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sanjay.nadarajah</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-04T02:20:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re : FWSM failover Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/re-fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1487449#M660206</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is that I have a pair of FWSM that resides on a 6509 and when the primary went down the secondary was active.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the primary came up, the secondary was still the active FW. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the config for the primary and secondary part on the FWSM (IPs changed)&amp;nbsp; :-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan unit primary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan interface Failover Vlan74&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover link State Vlan75&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover interface ip Failover 10.4.10.67 255.255.255.248 standby 10.4.10.68&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover interface ip State 10.4.7.74 255.255.255.248 standby 10.4.7.75&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan unit secondary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan interface Failover Vlan74&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover link State Vlan75&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover interface ip Failover 10.4.10.67 255.255.255.248 standby 10.4.10.68&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover interface ip State 10.4.7.74 255.255.255.248 standby 10.4.7.75&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to make the primary active when it comes back up ? Ie) Similar to using the 'preempt' command for HSRP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please advice,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SN -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:20:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/re-fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1487449#M660206</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanjay.nadarajah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T18:20:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re : FWSM failover Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/re-fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1487450#M660221</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sanjay,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The 'failover preempt' command might help you here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm40/command/reference/ef.html#wp1667787"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm40/command/reference/ef.html#wp1667787&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is only available in 3.2.x, 4.0.x. and 4.1.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Magnus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:03:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/re-fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1487450#M660221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Magnus Mortensen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-04T02:03:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re : FWSM failover Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/re-fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1487451#M660253</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Magnus &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SN -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:20:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/re-fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1487451#M660253</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanjay.nadarajah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-04T02:20:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

