<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Help finding a good small remote office solution in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/help-finding-a-good-small-remote-office-solution/m-p/1481071#M662005</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yup, one of the 800 Branch Office routers should be able to handle it &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/index.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; They can also provide security and other features. Depending on your traffic load they will be able to do what you need.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you need a firewall for that you could use a 5505 or a 5510 that should be able to handle your traffic &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:08:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Panos Kampanakis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-07T18:08:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Help finding a good small remote office solution</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/help-finding-a-good-small-remote-office-solution/m-p/1481070#M661987</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am needing a solution for a small branch office with WIFI, VPN, POE, VOIP W/QOS, min 8, 10/100 ethernet ports with POE, and can use DSL or Cable as the primary ISP.&amp;nbsp; I was looking at the 871, but I am not sure if this is what we need.&amp;nbsp; Any help pointing us in the right direction, would be great.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/help-finding-a-good-small-remote-office-solution/m-p/1481070#M661987</guid>
      <dc:creator>troberts.isu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T18:08:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Help finding a good small remote office solution</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/help-finding-a-good-small-remote-office-solution/m-p/1481071#M662005</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yup, one of the 800 Branch Office routers should be able to handle it &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/index.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; They can also provide security and other features. Depending on your traffic load they will be able to do what you need.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you need a firewall for that you could use a 5505 or a 5510 that should be able to handle your traffic &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:08:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/help-finding-a-good-small-remote-office-solution/m-p/1481071#M662005</guid>
      <dc:creator>Panos Kampanakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-07T18:08:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Help finding a good small remote office solution</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/help-finding-a-good-small-remote-office-solution/m-p/1481072#M662020</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the fast reply.&amp;nbsp; The 871 looked like the best fit, I just wanted to make sure.&amp;nbsp; How scaleable is it, we may need to add up to a total of 12 connections, with up to 8 phones.&amp;nbsp; I know it only has 2 POE ports, I should be able to add an additional POE switch to it without any issue correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/help-finding-a-good-small-remote-office-solution/m-p/1481072#M662020</guid>
      <dc:creator>troberts.isu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-08T13:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Help finding a good small remote office solution</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/help-finding-a-good-small-remote-office-solution/m-p/1481073#M662028</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it will not be a problem. Both POE switch and the devices and connections you are mentioning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only limitation that I see is traffic load, which given the devices you mentioned will not be significant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:20:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/help-finding-a-good-small-remote-office-solution/m-p/1481073#M662028</guid>
      <dc:creator>Panos Kampanakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-08T14:20:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

