<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPS 4240 high CPU in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-high-cpu/m-p/1486690#M66675</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paul;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; In current releases of IPS software (starting with the release of the E3 analysis engine); high CPU in and of itself is not a good judge of sensor performance.&amp;nbsp; A better indicator is the "Inspection Load" (big speedometer on the home page).&amp;nbsp; This looks to be just over 10% in your attached screenshot.&amp;nbsp; The reaoning for this is a change in interface processing implemented in the E3 analysis engine.&amp;nbsp; From the release notes from the E3 release:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;The E3 engine software contains changes from CSCsu77935.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The resolution of this defect modified the sensor's idle time algorithm,&lt;BR /&gt;applying additional CPU to polling of the NICs to decrease the polling&lt;BR /&gt;interval and reduce latency.&amp;nbsp; This results in the CPU usage being reported&lt;BR /&gt;higher than previous releases, including by external tools such as top and ps.&lt;BR /&gt;This additional CPU load can be noticed on single-CPU platforms, as well as the&lt;BR /&gt;primary CPU of multi-core systems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since the additional CPU load that is reported while polling is actually&lt;BR /&gt;available to process packets, and reduces as inspection load goes up, it does&lt;BR /&gt;not negatively affect the overall throughput of the IPS.&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The best indication of sensor load is shown under "Processing Load Percentage"&lt;BR /&gt;in the "show statistics virtual-sensor" command output and IME Home Page Dial.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; If there is indication of impact to traffic traversing&amp;nbsp; the IPS-4240, then it would be beneficial to open a service request with&amp;nbsp; TAC and provide the full output of 'sh conf' and 'sh tech' for review.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fringer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-30T11:10:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPS 4240 high CPU</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-high-cpu/m-p/1486689#M66674</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The customer has a IPS 4240 running version 7 and is experiencing high CPU utilization. It ranges between 80 and 100% of utilization. We disabled some alerts from some of the events we are getting but the issue remains. The customer has the IPS between the internet router and the ASA with a 20Mb internet connection. According to the customer the normal utilization is around 30%. The customer has rebooted the device a couple if times but the CPU spikes again. The memory utilization is low.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know if there are any troubleshooting steps we can follow or any information I can collect in order to find the cause of the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will appreciate any help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paul G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here I am uploading some information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:06:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-high-cpu/m-p/1486689#M66674</guid>
      <dc:creator>PAUL GILBERT ARIAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T12:06:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS 4240 high CPU</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-high-cpu/m-p/1486690#M66675</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paul;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; In current releases of IPS software (starting with the release of the E3 analysis engine); high CPU in and of itself is not a good judge of sensor performance.&amp;nbsp; A better indicator is the "Inspection Load" (big speedometer on the home page).&amp;nbsp; This looks to be just over 10% in your attached screenshot.&amp;nbsp; The reaoning for this is a change in interface processing implemented in the E3 analysis engine.&amp;nbsp; From the release notes from the E3 release:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;The E3 engine software contains changes from CSCsu77935.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The resolution of this defect modified the sensor's idle time algorithm,&lt;BR /&gt;applying additional CPU to polling of the NICs to decrease the polling&lt;BR /&gt;interval and reduce latency.&amp;nbsp; This results in the CPU usage being reported&lt;BR /&gt;higher than previous releases, including by external tools such as top and ps.&lt;BR /&gt;This additional CPU load can be noticed on single-CPU platforms, as well as the&lt;BR /&gt;primary CPU of multi-core systems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since the additional CPU load that is reported while polling is actually&lt;BR /&gt;available to process packets, and reduces as inspection load goes up, it does&lt;BR /&gt;not negatively affect the overall throughput of the IPS.&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The best indication of sensor load is shown under "Processing Load Percentage"&lt;BR /&gt;in the "show statistics virtual-sensor" command output and IME Home Page Dial.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; If there is indication of impact to traffic traversing&amp;nbsp; the IPS-4240, then it would be beneficial to open a service request with&amp;nbsp; TAC and provide the full output of 'sh conf' and 'sh tech' for review.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-4240-high-cpu/m-p/1486690#M66675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fringer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-30T11:10:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

