<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPS Management port in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474925#M66838</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The management interface of any managed device should be on your management network. The sniffing (promiscious mode) or in-line interfaces should be relitively immune to attack (compared to a normal host interface, or even the management interface of the IPS sensor).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I worry more about the management interface of the sensors than the in-line interfaces. Cisco has been slow to adapt external authentication, password aging/enforcement etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:36:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rhermes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-02T15:36:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPS Management port</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474924#M66836</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have an IPS sensor on the public part of your network (Perimeter) is it okay to have the Mgmt port plugged into the internal network?&amp;nbsp; i.e. can the Mgmt interface be used to facilitate an attack if the device was comprimised?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And does this answer apply to routers and ASA's also?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:04:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474924#M66836</guid>
      <dc:creator>networker99</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T12:04:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS Management port</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474925#M66838</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The management interface of any managed device should be on your management network. The sniffing (promiscious mode) or in-line interfaces should be relitively immune to attack (compared to a normal host interface, or even the management interface of the IPS sensor).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I worry more about the management interface of the sensors than the in-line interfaces. Cisco has been slow to adapt external authentication, password aging/enforcement etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:36:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474925#M66838</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhermes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-02T15:36:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS Management port</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474926#M66844</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an update to Bob's reply, RADIUS support for authentication was added in IPS release 7.0(4)E4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is also ehancements to defining password sizes, required number of special characters (digits, upper/lowercase, other) along with historical passwords remembered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474926#M66844</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fringer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-16T12:22:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS Management port</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474927#M66847</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if Cisco has made IPv6 addressability of the management interface a committed feature yet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I heard it was committed for support in some future version of CSM, but last I heard not the sensor software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have lots of IPv6 preperation to do this year, knowing these things would make my planning a little smoother.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474927#M66847</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhermes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-18T20:11:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS Management port</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474928#M66848</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a Bug ID (feature request) to add IPv6 management interface addresssing ability to the IPS sensors. The bug ID is: CSCsa60286&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&amp;amp;bugId=CSCth75245"&gt;http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&amp;amp;bugId=CSCth75245&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should be able to follow this link, save the bug, and get updates if there are any changes (no updates for awhile now).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-management-port/m-p/1474928#M66848</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jami Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-26T23:28:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

