<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX using two default routes - Is per-packet load balancing  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-using-two-default-routes-is-per-packet-load-balancing/m-p/89342#M669224</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do run a dynamic protocol i.e. RIP with equal costs, how would the PIX handle it?  Would it "per-packet" load balance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:54:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adam.wilkins</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-11-13T20:54:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX using two default routes - Is per-packet load balancing possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-using-two-default-routes-is-per-packet-load-balancing/m-p/89340#M669198</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a PIX firewall that needs two default routes pointing to two separate HSRP addresses.  Can I configure two default routes in the PIX and is it possible to do per-packet load balancing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:22:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-using-two-default-routes-is-per-packet-load-balancing/m-p/89340#M669198</guid>
      <dc:creator>adam.wilkins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:22:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX using two default routes - Is per-packet load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-using-two-default-routes-is-per-packet-load-balancing/m-p/89341#M669208</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PIX can only have 1 prefered route for any destination.  Multiple routes for the same destination can be learned via RIP for example, and both will show up in a "show route," however only the route with the best metric will be used.  If you were to enter 2 equal cost routes into the PIX, the 2nd entry would overwrite the 1st one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bryan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:36:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-using-two-default-routes-is-per-packet-load-balancing/m-p/89341#M669208</guid>
      <dc:creator>bosoro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-13T20:36:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX using two default routes - Is per-packet load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-using-two-default-routes-is-per-packet-load-balancing/m-p/89342#M669224</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do run a dynamic protocol i.e. RIP with equal costs, how would the PIX handle it?  Would it "per-packet" load balance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:54:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-using-two-default-routes-is-per-packet-load-balancing/m-p/89342#M669224</guid>
      <dc:creator>adam.wilkins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-13T20:54:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX using two default routes - Is per-packet load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-using-two-default-routes-is-per-packet-load-balancing/m-p/89343#M669237</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adam,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well from my testing, it will just pick 1 of them and use it.  I believe it will just use the most recently learned route.   So if you can get the 2 devices to send RIP updates per-packet to the PIX, then you're set &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Bryan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-using-two-default-routes-is-per-packet-load-balancing/m-p/89343#M669237</guid>
      <dc:creator>bosoro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-13T20:56:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

