<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dual ISP and PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77385#M672403</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configure HSRP on the two Internet routers.  Connect a crossover between the 2 routers and Run IBGP between them.  This has worked great for several of my customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bill CARTER</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-11-29T19:03:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dual ISP and PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77384#M672402</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have Internet feeds from two isp's. Routers running BGP and two Pix 525s configured with statefull failover. I would like to use both the links for load balancing and not use hsrp. All the notes I have read point to placing a router in front of the firewall and behind the two Innternet routers. This obviously creates a single point of failure which we would like to avoid. To summarise, how do I get the firewall to use both links?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77384#M672402</guid>
      <dc:creator>lkhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:55:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual ISP and PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77385#M672403</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configure HSRP on the two Internet routers.  Connect a crossover between the 2 routers and Run IBGP between them.  This has worked great for several of my customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77385#M672403</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill CARTER</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-29T19:03:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual ISP and PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77386#M672404</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your reply. Could you please elaborate a bit more. Eack of my routers have single ethernet ports that connect to the lan segment with the firewall. Do I need another ethernet port? If I run HSRP will it not use the primary router for all outbound traffic? How does your soluation load balance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2001 09:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77386#M672404</guid>
      <dc:creator>lkhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-03T09:44:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual ISP and PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77387#M672405</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I worked on this exact issue about 6 months ago.  My memory is quickly fading, but I do know that you will not be able to get the PIXs to load balance unless you use a device like the CSS11000 in front of and behind the PIXs. Essentially, you have will be able to design redundancy, but not load-balancing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We put one router with multiple ethernet interfaces between the PIXs and our 2 ISP routers. We performed policy routing based on the source address of our lan segment hosts.  We had a class C, so we policy routed even IP address out of ISP router A and odd IP addresses out of ISP router B. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was just as unimpressed that there were no specific examples of this type of configuration anywhere on CCO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2001 14:38:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77387#M672405</guid>
      <dc:creator>asafayan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-03T14:38:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual ISP and PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77388#M672407</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;  You can use a load balancing switch/router to load balance the PIX firewalls and your border routers.  I am running an identical environment using BIG IP 5000's from F5. You may not need application load balancing of that nature or price ($$$) Cisco Arrowpoint switches, Foundry, and Alteon all make these switches/routers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2001 19:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/dual-isp-and-pix/m-p/77388#M672407</guid>
      <dc:creator>thompson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-03T19:48:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

