<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: UDP flooding, 2 routers and PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/udp-flooding-2-routers-and-pix/m-p/21767#M673869</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you know the udp port numbers it would go a long way, i flooded udp by using the helper address .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the destination address is on the far side of the &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pix you could try that. along with the forward protocol statement. (see the ios doc) Other wise &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;its an access list &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 21:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>millerv</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-07-31T21:06:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UDP flooding, 2 routers and PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/udp-flooding-2-routers-and-pix/m-p/21766#M673844</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 routers with 2 FE interfaces each and PIX between &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;them. Flow is unidirectional. Firewall is neccessary &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;at this point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;--FE--R--FE--PIX--FE--R--&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to the document:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/cs006.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/cs006.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can forward broadcasts from ethernet of one router to another ethernet of another router. I'm not shure that this configuration is possible on the PIX. It must pass this traffic. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Somebody do so?????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regard Matvey Teplov.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/udp-flooding-2-routers-and-pix/m-p/21766#M673844</guid>
      <dc:creator>m.teplov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:49:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UDP flooding, 2 routers and PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/udp-flooding-2-routers-and-pix/m-p/21767#M673869</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you know the udp port numbers it would go a long way, i flooded udp by using the helper address .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the destination address is on the far side of the &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pix you could try that. along with the forward protocol statement. (see the ios doc) Other wise &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;its an access list &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 21:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/udp-flooding-2-routers-and-pix/m-p/21767#M673869</guid>
      <dc:creator>millerv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-31T21:06:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

