<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPS for 10GB in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410840#M67855</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The highest Cisco IDS is the 4570 that can do up to 4Gbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA with AIP has much less throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;don't even consider an AIP for the throughput you need.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Panos Kampanakis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-17T00:14:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPS for 10GB</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410836#M67844</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer who wants an IPS that can support a full 10GB throughput. This is to go with a data center taht will be Nexus 7000 based with 6500 service switches hung off it. Anyone know of a way of doing this with Cisco kit as I really do't want to have to go wIth a&amp;nbsp; Juniper IDP 8200.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pat&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:55:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410836#M67844</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Colbeck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:55:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS for 10GB</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410837#M67847</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco's IDS and IDSM blades do not support 10Gbps YET.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the best IDS has about hlf name speed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The solution that I could suggest is considering to have 2 IDSes in an Etherchannel and have them both inspect traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That could scale well for atomic signatures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it helps a little.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410837#M67847</guid>
      <dc:creator>Panos Kampanakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T20:22:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS for 10GB</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410838#M67850</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The highest is the ASA5540 with AIP SSM but it won't support 10Gb.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410838#M67850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T22:04:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS for 10GB</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410839#M67852</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks guys. Looks like I will have to go with the Juniper. At least MARS supports the Juniper so it'snot a total loss on the Cisco front.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410839#M67852</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Colbeck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T22:16:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS for 10GB</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410840#M67855</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The highest Cisco IDS is the 4570 that can do up to 4Gbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA with AIP has much less throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;don't even consider an AIP for the throughput you need.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410840#M67855</guid>
      <dc:creator>Panos Kampanakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T00:14:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS for 10GB</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410841#M67858</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt;
&lt;style&gt;
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-qformat:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin-top:0in;
	mso-para-margin-right:0in;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
	mso-para-margin-left:0in;
	line-height:115%;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am interested in this as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pkampana, the OP brought up IPS.&amp;nbsp; Is there a distinction among Cisco's products in the context of throughput operating as an IDS vs IPS.&amp;nbsp; In that IPS actively "denies" attackers/packets/connections which it calculates as harmful (via the Risk Rating formula)?&amp;nbsp; I am not asking about the "Block" actions, only "Deny" actions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand that the message is the AIP sensors cannot perform at the same rates as the appliances.&amp;nbsp; I would not be surprised at this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can one Cisco&lt;STRONG&gt; IPS&lt;/STRONG&gt; appliances be inserted into ALL flows of data between ALL logical interfaces of a Cisco ASA, or, would a firm need to purchase one Cisco IPS appliance for each logical interface, or would it only be able to operate as an IDS?&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;If this particular design scenario is documented, I’m overlooking it.&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:07:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410841#M67858</guid>
      <dc:creator>bnidacoc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T19:07:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS for 10GB</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410842#M67860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AIP scans packets in the ASA's backplane, so it doesn't have to do with interface pairs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The throughput it can do is not asa hagh as 10Gbps. Not even close. check the AIP-SSM model for specs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:34:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410842#M67860</guid>
      <dc:creator>Panos Kampanakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T20:34:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS for 10GB</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410843#M67863</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been using the 4260's and 4270's but are now going to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10gb. Rather than etherchanneling enought 4270's to get to 10gb or waiting&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on the stability of the new Cisco 10gb sensors getting released soon our need is now. So&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt; after extensive testing we have decided to go with McAfee M8000's where we need the 10GB line speed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:34:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-for-10gb/m-p/1410843#M67863</guid>
      <dc:creator>pjsutton1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-01T13:34:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

