<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IPS Signature Statuses in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-signature-statuses/m-p/1408444#M68119</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm struggling to find a definitive answer or reason for some of the configuration IPS signature statuses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What does the enabled setting in a rule actually mean in relation to retired and obsolete rules?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have lots of rules which are enabled but which are also set as retired and/or obsolete. I'm assuming from my reaserach that these are not active rules&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why are these enabled? (especially when it doesn't mean anything?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate that retired rules can be overidden and set to active, but surely when using the defaults from Cisco the retird rules should not be enabled?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm really confused by the non-sensical approach of both this and MARS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be gratefully received.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>markidotw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:52:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPS Signature Statuses</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-signature-statuses/m-p/1408444#M68119</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm struggling to find a definitive answer or reason for some of the configuration IPS signature statuses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What does the enabled setting in a rule actually mean in relation to retired and obsolete rules?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have lots of rules which are enabled but which are also set as retired and/or obsolete. I'm assuming from my reaserach that these are not active rules&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why are these enabled? (especially when it doesn't mean anything?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate that retired rules can be overidden and set to active, but surely when using the defaults from Cisco the retird rules should not be enabled?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm really confused by the non-sensical approach of both this and MARS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be gratefully received.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-signature-statuses/m-p/1408444#M68119</guid>
      <dc:creator>markidotw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:52:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS Signature Statuses</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-signature-statuses/m-p/1408445#M68120</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anybody?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:43:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-signature-statuses/m-p/1408445#M68120</guid>
      <dc:creator>markidotw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-29T09:43:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

