<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: the problems pix 520 with multiple network interfaces. in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/the-problems-pix-520-with-multiple-network-interfaces/m-p/10082#M681263</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Never put a deny and a permit in the same acl, Break them apart into two separate lists.  Also, 4.2(3) is pretty old code. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wdrootz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-07-18T15:50:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>the problems pix 520 with multiple network interfaces.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/the-problems-pix-520-with-multiple-network-interfaces/m-p/10081#M681262</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have encounter a security access problem.One PIX 520 with four NICs.It has a enet interface with security value 10 and a hbnet interface with security value 20 besides the inside interface with security value 100 and the outside interface with secuirty value 0.i find the problem after i make a ACL policy configuration .below is what the command:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"outbound 1 deny 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;outbound 1 except 192.168.0.100 tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;outbound 1 permit 210.25.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp ;the address space 210.25.0.0 is in the ENET .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;apply (inside) 1 outgoing_dest          "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last,the soruce address host 192.168.0.100 can access the outside network,but unfortunated,it cann't access all the destination in the ENET.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Pix software version is 4.2(3).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what is the reason?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:48:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/the-problems-pix-520-with-multiple-network-interfaces/m-p/10081#M681262</guid>
      <dc:creator>litao-ma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:48:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: the problems pix 520 with multiple network interfaces.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/the-problems-pix-520-with-multiple-network-interfaces/m-p/10082#M681263</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Never put a deny and a permit in the same acl, Break them apart into two separate lists.  Also, 4.2(3) is pretty old code. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/the-problems-pix-520-with-multiple-network-interfaces/m-p/10082#M681263</guid>
      <dc:creator>wdrootz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-18T15:50:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

