<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: promiscuous mode and inline pair  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257376#M68313</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/go/safe" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/go/safe&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>andrey.dugin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-06T12:42:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>promiscuous mode and inline pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257372#M68309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) What's the difference between promiscuous mode and inline pair pair?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Where the necessary use of each mode?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) if I have I-BANKING server located in the DMZ network, so what mode should be prefer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4)after the preferred mode then do I need to assign sensor on the outside and DMZ and the C&amp;amp;C in inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pls guide me&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257372#M68309</guid>
      <dc:creator>alsayed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:49:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: promiscuous mode and inline pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257373#M68310</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In promiscuous mode your sensor doesn't affect the traffic but it only listen and analyze it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In inline mode you direct all your traffic on this network segment you want to protect to IPS and it analyze it and block some actions according to your settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is the main difference. Which mode to prefer must be your decision.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:49:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257373#M68310</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrey.dugin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T12:49:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: promiscuous mode and inline pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257374#M68311</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;with inline mode, do you actually plug the connection from the Internet in what would normally be your promiscous interface?  I'm a little confused on how traffic is routed to the IPS first and then on to the firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257374#M68311</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adam Frederick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T20:33:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: promiscuous mode and inline pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257375#M68312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can u post me a usefull design guide with the IPS &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10xs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257375#M68312</guid>
      <dc:creator>alsayed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T12:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: promiscuous mode and inline pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257376#M68313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/go/safe" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/go/safe&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/promiscuous-mode-and-inline-pair/m-p/1257376#M68313</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrey.dugin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T12:42:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

