<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX routing in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-routing/m-p/162273#M683204</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have configured a PIX with two outside interfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet0 outside security0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet2 outside2 security0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On one interface the network 172.16.1.0/24, on the other the network 172.16.2.0/24 can be reached. The PIX can communicate with the destination through both network (gateway redundancy). If I configure two default routes with different metric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside 0 0 172.16.1.1 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside2 0 0 172.16.2.1 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I pull out the ethernet cable from the outside interface, the PIX keeps trying to send packet through this interface and doesn't switch to the other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I force the PIX to do this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway is there any other solution to handle the redundant gateways?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried the RIP2 but the timeout of a RIP entry is too long, I need FASTER switching over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gabor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:25:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gsebok</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:25:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-routing/m-p/162273#M683204</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have configured a PIX with two outside interfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet0 outside security0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet2 outside2 security0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On one interface the network 172.16.1.0/24, on the other the network 172.16.2.0/24 can be reached. The PIX can communicate with the destination through both network (gateway redundancy). If I configure two default routes with different metric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside 0 0 172.16.1.1 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside2 0 0 172.16.2.1 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I pull out the ethernet cable from the outside interface, the PIX keeps trying to send packet through this interface and doesn't switch to the other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I force the PIX to do this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway is there any other solution to handle the redundant gateways?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried the RIP2 but the timeout of a RIP entry is too long, I need FASTER switching over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gabor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:25:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-routing/m-p/162273#M683204</guid>
      <dc:creator>gsebok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:25:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-routing/m-p/162274#M683214</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the two gateways, are they cisco routers? If they are, I should choose to implement HSRP (hot standby routing protocol) on the two gateways.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 16:08:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-routing/m-p/162274#M683214</guid>
      <dc:creator>tvanginneken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-12-09T16:08:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-routing/m-p/162275#M683225</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, the two gateways are CISCO routers and we have already used HSRP, but anyway I would like to find out why the PIX behaves itselves such 'abnormal' way. The PIX is a 506, the sw is 6.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gabor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 16:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-routing/m-p/162275#M683225</guid>
      <dc:creator>gsebok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-12-09T16:51:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-routing/m-p/162276#M683248</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you adjust RIP timers for faster switching.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:17:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-routing/m-p/162276#M683248</guid>
      <dc:creator>rais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-12-10T01:17:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

