<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: S441 Sig 21622/1 activity in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335206#M68449</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same here as well. Seems this signature is causing false positives more than anything else. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lhill</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-15T15:30:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>S441 Sig 21622/1 activity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335204#M68445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After deploying sig update 441 we are seeing a tremendous amount of alerts for subsig 1.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems unusual, the Fidelity rating is 90, which means likelihood of this being a false positive is minimal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is anyone else seeing a high number of alerts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:47:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335204#M68445</guid>
      <dc:creator>barnettcd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T11:47:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S441 Sig 21622/1 activity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335205#M68447</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am seeing quite a few hits on that subsig as well. Several images being blocked from different credible domains.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335205#M68447</guid>
      <dc:creator>charles lewis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-14T15:28:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S441 Sig 21622/1 activity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335206#M68449</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same here as well. Seems this signature is causing false positives more than anything else. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335206#M68449</guid>
      <dc:creator>lhill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-15T15:30:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S441 Sig 21622/1 activity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335207#M68451</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are seeing this signature kick of a lot of alerts as well.  Just wondering if Cisco has confirmed there is something wrong with Sig 21622?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:47:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335207#M68451</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonPBerbee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-16T14:47:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S441 Sig 21622/1 activity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335208#M68454</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Updated version of that will be in S442. Which should be on CCO shortly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:07:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335208#M68454</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsulym</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-16T15:07:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S441 Sig 21622/1 activity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335209#M68456</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the heads up.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:32:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/s441-sig-21622-1-activity/m-p/1335209#M68456</guid>
      <dc:creator>barnettcd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-16T16:32:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

