<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX OS 6.2 &amp; Conduits in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107302#M684823</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't know if anyone else has noticed this but, I upgraded our PIX to 6.2 yesterday and the syntax of the Conduit command seems to have changed slightly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My Conduits from the previous OS were not taken and I had to recreate them all changing the syntax slightly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just watch out if your doing a remote upgrade of the OS and won't have console access during the reboot !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:04:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>johnbroadway</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:04:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX OS 6.2 &amp; Conduits</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107302#M684823</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't know if anyone else has noticed this but, I upgraded our PIX to 6.2 yesterday and the syntax of the Conduit command seems to have changed slightly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My Conduits from the previous OS were not taken and I had to recreate them all changing the syntax slightly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just watch out if your doing a remote upgrade of the OS and won't have console access during the reboot !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:04:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107302#M684823</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnbroadway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:04:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX OS 6.2 &amp; Conduits</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107303#M684824</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interesting.. I did this also the other day but I have access lists not conduits - and had no problems.. good to know though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 04:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107303#M684824</guid>
      <dc:creator>rgrcommo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-04T04:54:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX OS 6.2 &amp; Conduits</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107304#M684825</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you post a short description of the syntactic differences?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 17:45:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107304#M684825</guid>
      <dc:creator>cyee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-04T17:45:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX OS 6.2 &amp; Conduits</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107305#M684826</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I noticed that  the conduit command doesn't seem to accept any global mask except for a /32 or the keyword host.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It gives a "Source address doesn't pair" error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only solution I could find was to use /32 or the keyword host.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2002 06:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107305#M684826</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnbroadway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-10T06:44:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX OS 6.2 &amp; Conduits</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107306#M684827</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello all, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a conduit command on my PIX that allows a ping from workstations on my lan to reach a remote machine across the net. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;conduit permit icmp host 65.165.98.171 170.31.92.16 255.255.255.252 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The host ip above is my (outside) IP address on my PIX. How can I accomplish the same thing with an access-list? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe NAT allows all (pings) out but the reply just cannot get back in. Do I place an access-group on the (outside) interface "in" &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jerry Roy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:21:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107306#M684827</guid>
      <dc:creator>jerry.roy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-17T23:21:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX OS 6.2 &amp; Conduits</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107307#M684828</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you go to the PIX Support Pages, and search on ICMP, you'll find the document that explains how to manage ICMP traffic using the older method, as well as the newer access-list method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:32:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-os-6-2-conduits/m-p/107307#M684828</guid>
      <dc:creator>jwitherell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-18T11:32:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

