<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX Fail-over Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-question/m-p/36371#M686431</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PIX 515 cannot be a failover unit for a pix 520. The hardware, software, memory, etc needs to be the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 21:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rrbleeker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-01-08T21:35:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX Fail-over Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-question/m-p/36370#M686401</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a PIX 520 in production.  It also happens to be my only potential single point of failure.  Because of this, I've been trying to convince my boss that I need another PIX for fail-over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;He doesn't want to spend any more than he has to and has come across someone with a PIX 515 that he can barter for.  So you can probably guess what my question is...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can a PIX 520 and a PIX 515 be configured to fail-over?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas Waddell&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Network Engineer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Norske Systems&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Houston, TX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="mailto:thomas.waddell@norskesystems.com" target="_blank"&gt;thomas.waddell@norskesystems.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-question/m-p/36370#M686401</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas.waddell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:56:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Fail-over Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-question/m-p/36371#M686431</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PIX 515 cannot be a failover unit for a pix 520. The hardware, software, memory, etc needs to be the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 21:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-fail-over-question/m-p/36371#M686431</guid>
      <dc:creator>rrbleeker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-08T21:35:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

