<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic pix inside an internal network in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-an-internal-network/m-p/26973#M686453</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I installed a pix 506 to protect a single server inside a network the network is divided into 2 nets:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the 1st net has an IP adress of 131.107.0.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the second network has an ip of 10.3.1.0 255.255.255.248&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the pix is protecting ip 10.3.1.3 255.255.255.248&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the nat inside the pix is the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 10.3.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.248&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 10.3.1.0 255.255.255.248 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the problem is when we change the global outside address to 10.3.1.5-8 we can access the outside interface but we do not access it with the  10.3.1.3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;even when we change the ip address of the protrcted server it still doesn't work; i need to keep this address because i have a VPN that forwards information to that specific address and to a  specific port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyhelp with this problem?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fellis20</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:56:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pix inside an internal network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-an-internal-network/m-p/26973#M686453</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I installed a pix 506 to protect a single server inside a network the network is divided into 2 nets:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the 1st net has an IP adress of 131.107.0.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the second network has an ip of 10.3.1.0 255.255.255.248&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the pix is protecting ip 10.3.1.3 255.255.255.248&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the nat inside the pix is the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 10.3.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.248&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 10.3.1.0 255.255.255.248 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the problem is when we change the global outside address to 10.3.1.5-8 we can access the outside interface but we do not access it with the  10.3.1.3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;even when we change the ip address of the protrcted server it still doesn't work; i need to keep this address because i have a VPN that forwards information to that specific address and to a  specific port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyhelp with this problem?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-an-internal-network/m-p/26973#M686453</guid>
      <dc:creator>fellis20</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:56:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix inside an internal network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-an-internal-network/m-p/26974#M686499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I understand clearly:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The OUTSIDE is: 131.107.0.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The INSIDE is:10.3.1.0/29&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The server IP is: 10.3.1.3 (?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You want to reach that server form the OUTSIDE using the IP 10.3.1.3. Is that correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so, forget all global and nat statements, and configure the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside, outside) 10.3.1.3 10.3.1.3 0 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to start connections form the INSIDE (10.3.1.0/29) you'd better change the global address to an IP address form the OUTSIDE IP address range (131.107.0.0/24). Don't forget, that even if you use nat, the STATICed hosts will use the IP addresses specified in the static statements. But from your info I guess there is no need to initiate connections form the INSIDE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bests,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Attila Suba&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-inside-an-internal-network/m-p/26974#M686499</guid>
      <dc:creator>subaa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-03T16:35:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

