topic Attack Relevancy Rating in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/attack-relevancy-rating/m-p/1306713#M68766 <P>What is the internal value of the Attack Relevancy Rating for the system with relevance=not-relevant. I do not see any difference for the system with relevance=unknown. In the attachment you will find the example of an attack? It is OK or not?</P><P>Looking forward ho hearing from you </P><P></P><P> </P><P></P> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:44:09 GMT k.dmowski 2019-03-10T11:44:09Z Attack Relevancy Rating https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/attack-relevancy-rating/m-p/1306713#M68766 <P>What is the internal value of the Attack Relevancy Rating for the system with relevance=not-relevant. I do not see any difference for the system with relevance=unknown. In the attachment you will find the example of an attack? It is OK or not?</P><P>Looking forward ho hearing from you </P><P></P><P> </P><P></P> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:44:09 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/attack-relevancy-rating/m-p/1306713#M68766 k.dmowski 2019-03-10T11:44:09Z Re: Attack Relevancy Rating https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/attack-relevancy-rating/m-p/1306714#M68768 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>value for ARR is adjusted as below :</P><P></P><P>- Unknown relevance : no change </P><P></P><P>- Relevant : +10 </P><P></P><P>- Not-Relevant : -10 for promiscuous mode and no change for inline mode.</P><P></P><P>From the above adjustments sensor is behaving as it is supposed to be in your case. Since the risk ratings are same for system with not-relevant and unknown OS, looks like your sensor is in inline mode.</P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:34:21 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/attack-relevancy-rating/m-p/1306714#M68768 mkodali 2009-08-14T12:34:21Z Re: Attack Relevancy Rating https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/attack-relevancy-rating/m-p/1306715#M68769 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi</P><P>Thank you very much for your information</P><P>Best regards</P><P>Kazimierz</P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:04:25 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/attack-relevancy-rating/m-p/1306715#M68769 k.dmowski 2009-08-14T13:04:25Z