<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX 506 Maximun Performance &amp; users in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11089#M692512</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;About my first question  would like to know if you have any comments. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>elepazote</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-01-21T21:50:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX 506 Maximun Performance &amp; users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11085#M692449</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would like to know if  anyone knows or had previos experience  using Pix 506 Firewall with nat and pat of how many user it will stand?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Talking with Cisco they told me It can stand 30,000 simultaneos connections. If every user uses a maximum average of: 200 connections? 100 connections ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then it could stand for: 30000/200 =150 user?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or 30000/100 = 300 users?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:56:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11085#M692449</guid>
      <dc:creator>elepazote</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:56:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 506 Maximun Performance &amp; users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11086#M692465</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NAT and PAT are not difficult tasks for the PIX.  Go with Cisco&amp;#146;s numbers.  Add VPN and you can get a performance hit on the 506.  In that case, you should getter a 515 instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2001 20:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11086#M692465</guid>
      <dc:creator>j-block</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-26T20:46:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 506 Maximun Performance &amp; users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11087#M692480</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Along a similar line of questioning--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a PIX 520, running v 5.1 code.  I have aprox 10k workstations on users networks behind the unit.  It uses aprox 15-18m of INternet acess bandwidth. I am currently using PAT translations, along with static tunnels.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many live IP addresses should I expect to need if I get away from using PAT and beging to use NAT instead ?  Is ther a formula/calculation-- or just black magic and experience ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:38:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11087#M692480</guid>
      <dc:creator>rrushing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-17T20:38:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 506 Maximun Performance &amp; users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11088#M692500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;one address for each static, which will work for both directions and a range for the rest of the hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;29bit address range = 6 addresses&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10 hosts inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;one mail server, one web server, = 2 statics&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8 hosts left could share a global range of remaining 4 addresses. This would leave half unable to connect at a time obviously.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;28bit range = 14 addresses = plenty for everybody&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11088#M692500</guid>
      <dc:creator>turnbull</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-19T08:06:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 506 Maximun Performance &amp; users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11089#M692512</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;About my first question  would like to know if you have any comments. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11089#M692512</guid>
      <dc:creator>elepazote</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-01-21T21:50:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 506 Maximun Performance &amp; users</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11090#M692521</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I couldn't imagine each user using 100 sessions.  It depeneds on what your users are doing but I would say the average user may use 25 sessions max.  Web browsing users will probably average 10-20 sessions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 15:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506-maximun-performance-users/m-p/11090#M692521</guid>
      <dc:creator>hewryf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-05T15:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

