<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX and W2K RADIUS in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-w2k-radius/m-p/8941#M693440</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What kind of problem are you having?  I've never setup Microsoft's RADIUS but I wouldn't think it can be that much different.  Are you looking at your PIX syslogs in debugging mode to see if the PIX is getting a response from it?  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:34:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>a-vazquez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-06-27T19:34:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX and W2K RADIUS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-w2k-radius/m-p/8940#M693425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has anyone been able to get a PIX to use W2K's Radius Server?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:48:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-w2k-radius/m-p/8940#M693425</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:48:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX and W2K RADIUS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-w2k-radius/m-p/8941#M693440</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What kind of problem are you having?  I've never setup Microsoft's RADIUS but I wouldn't think it can be that much different.  Are you looking at your PIX syslogs in debugging mode to see if the PIX is getting a response from it?  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:34:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-w2k-radius/m-p/8941#M693440</guid>
      <dc:creator>a-vazquez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-06-27T19:34:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX and W2K RADIUS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-w2k-radius/m-p/8942#M693470</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I have set the PIX to use W2k's Radius for our VPN, ACL Authentication, and testing for admin access?  It is strictly authentication not authorization, meaning if they authenticate then they are allowed.  The key thing is to make sure the w2k radius vendor option is set to Cisco, without this it will not work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2001 19:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-w2k-radius/m-p/8942#M693470</guid>
      <dc:creator>timtron</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-05T19:07:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

