<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX vs Netscreen in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-netscreen/m-p/8363#M693441</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lately, i notice netscreen offering greatest threat to PIX. Any comment?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:48:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX vs Netscreen</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-netscreen/m-p/8363#M693441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lately, i notice netscreen offering greatest threat to PIX. Any comment?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-netscreen/m-p/8363#M693441</guid>
      <dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:48:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX vs Netscreen</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-netscreen/m-p/8364#M693469</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Who is netscreen?  Just kidding.  There&amp;#146;s a lot of competing products and it&amp;#146;s like leap frog in this industry.  Cisco keeps up and continues to stand out as an exceptional product line.  My two cents.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:14:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-netscreen/m-p/8364#M693469</guid>
      <dc:creator>k.poplitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-06-15T21:14:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX vs Netscreen</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-netscreen/m-p/8365#M693498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with the first response.  In technology someone will always be faster or have more features for a short while.  Then they won't, then they will, Then some may be there under a new name and others not at all. Leap Frog.  I work with several vendors products.  Nokia has a $1000 per incident for support. For total cost and less headaches I'd recommend the PIX anyday.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vs-netscreen/m-p/8365#M693498</guid>
      <dc:creator>tmoreo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-06-21T17:16:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

