<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX NAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat/m-p/3899#M693908</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes it will be able to NAT....and for other question yes ...NAT supports H.323 but PAT does not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2001 15:14:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shabib.syed</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-04-08T15:14:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat/m-p/3896#M693905</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is a  PIX box able to perform NAT on internal interface to make external addresses compliant with the internal addressing ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:47:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat/m-p/3896#M693905</guid>
      <dc:creator>stefano.carboni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:47:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat/m-p/3897#M693906</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the PIX 520 able to perform use H.323 over NAT ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2001 20:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat/m-p/3897#M693906</guid>
      <dc:creator>williams.richardl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-03-06T20:14:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat/m-p/3898#M693907</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes PIX 520 can perform NAT for H.323&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2001 10:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat/m-p/3898#M693907</guid>
      <dc:creator>mahavirsj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-04-06T10:39:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat/m-p/3899#M693908</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes it will be able to NAT....and for other question yes ...NAT supports H.323 but PAT does not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2001 15:14:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat/m-p/3899#M693908</guid>
      <dc:creator>shabib.syed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-04-08T15:14:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

