<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: access-group direction in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ngfw/m-p/3803751#M6949</link>
    <description>You can use any combination as long as they work correctly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Simple one&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;access-l in per ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 205.0.0.0 0.0.0.255&lt;BR /&gt;access-l out per ip 205.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;access-g in interface inside&lt;BR /&gt;access-g in interface outside&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 03:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-18T03:26:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NGFW</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ngfw/m-p/3803606#M6946</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Pros and cons in your experience&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:49:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ngfw/m-p/3803606#M6946</guid>
      <dc:creator>seustache</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T16:49:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NGFW</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ngfw/m-p/3803628#M6948</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Check the Cisco Point of view&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/m/en_us/products/security/firewalls/competitive-comparison.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/m/en_us/products/security/firewalls/competitive-comparison.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Gartner point of view&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/enterprise-network-firewalls/vendors" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/enterprise-network-firewalls/vendors&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ngfw/m-p/3803628#M6948</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-17T17:54:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: access-group direction</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ngfw/m-p/3803751#M6949</link>
      <description>You can use any combination as long as they work correctly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Simple one&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;access-l in per ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 205.0.0.0 0.0.0.255&lt;BR /&gt;access-l out per ip 205.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;access-g in interface inside&lt;BR /&gt;access-g in interface outside&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 03:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ngfw/m-p/3803751#M6949</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-18T03:26:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

