<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pix and access-list in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-access-list/m-p/86892#M700197</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The doc said that access-list can replace conduit command .In the pix  I can use many conduit  command, If I can only use one  access-list ,there will be not convenience? Because if I edit one item in the access-list, I should edit the whole access-list?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2002 00:59:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>zoushan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-05-20T00:59:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pix and access-list</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-access-list/m-p/86890#M700195</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,everyone:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      I have a question : How many access-lists can apply to a pix interface?  I know that a router interface can only apply one  access-list to it in one direction(in or out).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-access-list/m-p/86890#M700195</guid>
      <dc:creator>zoushan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:04:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix and access-list</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-access-list/m-p/86891#M700196</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can only apply one access-list with access-group command to a particular interface. The access list is always applied in the "in" direction to the interface. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Router can have two IP access lists applied to the interface simultaneously - one "in" and one "out".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ROK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2002 08:06:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-access-list/m-p/86891#M700196</guid>
      <dc:creator>rokp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-17T08:06:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix and access-list</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-access-list/m-p/86892#M700197</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The doc said that access-list can replace conduit command .In the pix  I can use many conduit  command, If I can only use one  access-list ,there will be not convenience? Because if I edit one item in the access-list, I should edit the whole access-list?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2002 00:59:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-access-list/m-p/86892#M700197</guid>
      <dc:creator>zoushan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-20T00:59:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix and access-list</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-access-list/m-p/86893#M700198</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;The doc said that access-list can replace conduit command &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It can.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;In the pix I can use many conduit command, If I can only use one &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;access-list ,there will be not convenience? Because if I edit one item &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;in the access-list, I should edit the whole access-list?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An access-list can have many rules (especially now w/ 6.2 and Turbo ACLs).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can delete any line from access-list, but can only append to it, so, yes,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can have situation where you replace entire ACL with different one (the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;same procedure as in IOS routers - actually, PIX's ACLs behave like IOS &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;named ACLs).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ROK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2002 06:13:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-access-list/m-p/86893#M700198</guid>
      <dc:creator>rokp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-20T06:13:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

