<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX VLAN Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133709#M705063</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the responce..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wish this did hold true but there are probably 100 reasons why it does not.  OK, if thats the case can you apply in-bound and out-bound access lists to the VLAN interface?  Can you apply an access list at all to the VLAN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 10:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mike-greene</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-08-08T10:33:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX VLAN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133707#M705054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This new PIX VLAN stuff is really cool but I have one quick question.  Lets say you have configured the inside interface with 2 VLAN's 20 and 21.  Now, does the same hold true about a packet entering an interface cannot leave the same interface?  I just want to get this straight that this does not turn the PIX into a router or MSFC if you will.  Will it only forward packets entering the inside interface on these VLAN's, out another interface say the outside or the DMZ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:55:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133707#M705054</guid>
      <dc:creator>mike-greene</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:55:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX VLAN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133708#M705058</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nope, the old limitation doesn't hold true with VLAN interfaces.  You'll be able to send a packet in VLAN 20 and out VLAN 21, even though physically these are the same interface.  Logically within the PIX they're completely separate interfaces and treated as such.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 03:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133708#M705058</guid>
      <dc:creator>gfullage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-08T03:51:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX VLAN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133709#M705063</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the responce..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wish this did hold true but there are probably 100 reasons why it does not.  OK, if thats the case can you apply in-bound and out-bound access lists to the VLAN interface?  Can you apply an access list at all to the VLAN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 10:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133709#M705063</guid>
      <dc:creator>mike-greene</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-08T10:33:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX VLAN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133710#M705067</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or, if you cannot apply access lists to the logical interfaces, can you control the communication between the vlan's with the security level?  I'm going to have to set this up in a lab and let everyone know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 20:18:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133710#M705067</guid>
      <dc:creator>mike-greene</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-08T20:18:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX VLAN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133711#M705070</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes definately, that's the whole point of the PIX thinking they're separate interfaces.  Assign security levels just like you would for any dmz interface and assign nat/global or statics/ACL's accordingly to control access between them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 01:49:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133711#M705070</guid>
      <dc:creator>gfullage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-11T01:49:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX VLAN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133712#M705073</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:05:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-vlan-question/m-p/133712#M705073</guid>
      <dc:creator>mike-greene</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-11T12:05:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

