<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX 501 cannot access anything from E1 to E0 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149882#M705493</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could you tell me why the static command is better and why NAT0 is to be used instead for VPN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or perhaps point me to link where this would be discussed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:31:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>revahi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-01-14T10:31:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX 501 cannot access anything from E1 to E0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149876#M705487</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 1 ADSL router using its own NAT and PAT sitting between the ADSL point and E0. PC host on E1 unable to ping to the router on E0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config of PIX  as below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PIX Version 6.2(2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet0 outside security0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet1 inside security100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hostname pixfirewall&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;domain-name hamodia.co.uk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol ftp 21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol http 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol h323 h225 1720&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol ils 389&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol rsh 514&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol rtsp 554&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol smtp 25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol sqlnet 1521&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol sip 5060&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fixup protocol skinny 2000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;names&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list acl_in permit icmp any any &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list acl_out permit icmp any any &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pager lines 24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet0 10baset&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet1 10full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mtu outside 1500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mtu inside 1500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address outside 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address inside 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip audit info action alarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip audit attack action alarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pdm location 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.255 inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pdm history enable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;arp timeout 14400&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group acl_in in interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group acl_out in interface inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.254 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;timeout xlate 3:00:00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+ &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server LOCAL protocol local &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http server enable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.255 inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no snmp-server location&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no snmp-server contact&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snmp-server community public&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no snmp-server enable traps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;floodguard enable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no sysopt route dnat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;telnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;telnet timeout 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ssh timeout 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;terminal width 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config of PC:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Description . . . . . . . . . . . : 3Com EtherLink 10/100 PCI TX NIC (3C905B-TX)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-50-DA-E0-1E-CC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 158.43.240.3 DNS2 158.43.240.4             &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've also added a static route in the router on E0 as destination IP that of E1 and gateway IP that of E0 with a metric of 1 (no other router in between either interface) and a subnet first tried 255.255.255.255 which I thought means connection to host only and then 255.255.255.0 but unable to ping anything on E0 nor does the PC connect to the internet when the router is on E0. It only  works when router's on E1 but I suppose that defeats the purpose of the PIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the console I am able to ping both interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:29:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149876#M705487</guid>
      <dc:creator>revahi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:29:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 cannot access anything from E1 to E0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149877#M705488</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;since you are using the NAT0 statement, I suppose you don't want any address translation for packets originating from the inside network and going to the outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the NAT0 statement should only be used for VPN config to specify which traffic should not be translated and sent into the VPN tunnel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your setup, you should use the 'static' command instead, with two times the same network address. Like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Secondly, the access-list on the inside interface only allows icmp originating to the outside. All other traffic is implicitly dropped. Is that really what you want? By default all traffic from the inside to the outside is allowed, so you should not have to apply an access-list to the inside interface if you want to allow all traffic from the inside to the outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:51:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149877#M705488</guid>
      <dc:creator>tvanginneken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-12T11:51:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 cannot access anything from E1 to E0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149878#M705489</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using the NAT0 statement because a router attached to E0 does its own nat to the Internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've cleared the access list and added the static statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The host still can't ping the router on E0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is that becuase either the outside or the inside interface doesn't allow inbound ICMP traffic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way around this seeing as access-lists and groups don't do anything to inbound ICMP traffic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have also static a static route on this router pointing to the IP of E1 with the gateway set to the IP on E0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so far for your reponse.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Isaac&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:51:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149878#M705489</guid>
      <dc:creator>revahi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-13T11:51:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 cannot access anything from E1 to E0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149879#M705490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for icmp connectivity, there should only  be an access-list applied to the outside interface of the pix. This access-list should allow icmp reply traffic. Did you also remove the NAT0 statement? The static command should replace the nat0 command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you try a traceroute on an inside host and on the router to see that the correct route is followed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:12:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149879#M705490</guid>
      <dc:creator>tvanginneken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-13T12:12:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 cannot access anything from E1 to E0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149880#M705491</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've added the following statements for ICMP return traffic:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;icmp permit any echo-reply outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;icmp permit any information-reply outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;icmp permit any mask-reply outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;icmp permit any parameter-problem outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;icmp permit any source-quench outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;icmp permit any time-exceeded outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;icmp permit any timestamp-reply outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;icmp permit any unreachable outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;icmp deny any outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list ping_reply permit icmp any any echo-reply &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group ping_reply in interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've added the following static statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and then executed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;clear nat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;write mem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;reload&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The traceroute and ping to the router both time out but since adding the static &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;command Internet Access has now been possible even before clearing the &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NAT0 command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm a bit confused here, I assumed that the static command is to allow internet users (legitamate) access to a system on the inside such as a web server?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Isaac&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:14:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149880#M705491</guid>
      <dc:creator>revahi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-13T13:14:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 cannot access anything from E1 to E0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149881#M705492</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Isaac,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this command:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;has the same effect as the NAT0 command. Both the commands just make sure that the inside addresses are not translated. You should always use the static version, unless you are configuring VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:11:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149881#M705492</guid>
      <dc:creator>tvanginneken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-13T17:11:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 cannot access anything from E1 to E0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149882#M705493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could you tell me why the static command is better and why NAT0 is to be used instead for VPN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or perhaps point me to link where this would be discussed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:31:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-cannot-access-anything-from-e1-to-e0/m-p/149882#M705493</guid>
      <dc:creator>revahi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-01-14T10:31:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

