<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple PAT in PIX 525 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-pat-in-pix-525/m-p/108745#M706664</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your statement looks correct. When using second IP for PAT address, it's act as a backup, you will not see the second PAT being used till the first one running out of port numbers. It supports (in pratical sense) up to 4000 port translations. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2002 23:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>srittenberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-05-29T23:55:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple PAT in PIX 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-pat-in-pix-525/m-p/108743#M706662</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Sirs,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we`re using Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Version 5.2(8), and we neeed to configure multiple PAT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we try to put it with the command &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 x.y.z.a netmask 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for the first statement and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 a.c.d.e netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for the second IP PAT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But we don`t see any translation over the second one, just around the first one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a special configuration to performing the operation on PIX or is an automatic process?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is a round robin process between PAT IP address?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our PIX is a 525.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Carlos.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-pat-in-pix-525/m-p/108743#M706662</guid>
      <dc:creator>carlos.zelayandia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:04:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple PAT in PIX 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-pat-in-pix-525/m-p/108744#M706663</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PAT statements shall be for different IDs; i.e for different network segments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2002 22:45:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-pat-in-pix-525/m-p/108744#M706663</guid>
      <dc:creator>r.nair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-29T22:45:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple PAT in PIX 525</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-pat-in-pix-525/m-p/108745#M706664</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your statement looks correct. When using second IP for PAT address, it's act as a backup, you will not see the second PAT being used till the first one running out of port numbers. It supports (in pratical sense) up to 4000 port translations. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2002 23:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-pat-in-pix-525/m-p/108745#M706664</guid>
      <dc:creator>srittenberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-29T23:55:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

