<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX 6.2 is out! in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-6-2-is-out/m-p/30866#M706684</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for news. It supose to fix the long URL problem when working with url filter with websense. I'm going to test this out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>srittenberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-04-21T15:07:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX 6.2 is out!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-6-2-is-out/m-p/30865#M706678</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just incase people dont bother looking at the PIX site, 6.2 is out &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; yay!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it doesn't fix the RPC bug *sigh*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--Dave&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:02:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-6-2-is-out/m-p/30865#M706678</guid>
      <dc:creator>davecs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:02:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 6.2 is out!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-6-2-is-out/m-p/30866#M706684</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for news. It supose to fix the long URL problem when working with url filter with websense. I'm going to test this out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-6-2-is-out/m-p/30866#M706684</guid>
      <dc:creator>srittenberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-04-21T15:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 6.2 is out!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-6-2-is-out/m-p/30867#M706698</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;PIX FIREWALL OS v6.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Long distance (LAN) failover-No more serial cable distance limitation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Remote Management Support (RMS)/Auto update&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* PPPoE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Bi-directional NAT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Object grouping&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Network Time Protocol (NTP)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* VPN Hardware Client Mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Stub multicast routing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Packet capture (tcpdump)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Command-level authorization&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Turbo ACL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* ACS-based ACL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* LDAP fixup (NetMeeting)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* PAT for H323v2, SIP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* DHCP option 66, 150 (TFTP IP phone)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Enhance stateful failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* License upgrade via CLI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* CPU monitor via SNMP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* Long URL filtering&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;* N2H2 URL filtering&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:53:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-6-2-is-out/m-p/30867#M706698</guid>
      <dc:creator>zabbas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-04-22T18:53:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 6.2 is out!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-6-2-is-out/m-p/30868#M706712</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, but for those that DEPEND on PDM, DO NOT UPGRADE as PDM 2.0 (required for 6.2) is still in beta.  The previous version *may* work, but is not supported ans PDM 2.0(1) is required for 6.2.\&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:02:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-6-2-is-out/m-p/30868#M706712</guid>
      <dc:creator>baranowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-04-24T15:02:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

