<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX Version 5.2 vs 6.x in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-version-5-2-vs-6-x/m-p/50053#M707814</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My experience with PIX code suggests keeping it current but not too current (unless there&amp;#146;s a new feature you have to have).  So as a rule, I always stay on the latest revision of the previous version.  For example, they&amp;#146;re on 6.0(1) now, so I&amp;#146;m running 5.3(2).  When 6.1 comes out, I&amp;#146;ll move to 6.0(last) unless I find reason to move sooner (bugs, features, or security advisories).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 21:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wdrootz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-09-06T21:51:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX Version 5.2 vs 6.x</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-version-5-2-vs-6-x/m-p/50052#M707813</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently running 5.2 on both our 515's - Is it advisable to upgrade to 6?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Licensed Features:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failover:       Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN-DES:        Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maximum Interfaces:     6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cut-through Proxy:      Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guards:         Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Websense:       Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Throughput:     Unlimited&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ISAKMP peers:   Unlimited&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will change-over affect any of our enabled features?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why/Why not (Security issues with 6)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate any replies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:49:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-version-5-2-vs-6-x/m-p/50052#M707813</guid>
      <dc:creator>mbellears</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:49:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Version 5.2 vs 6.x</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-version-5-2-vs-6-x/m-p/50053#M707814</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My experience with PIX code suggests keeping it current but not too current (unless there&amp;#146;s a new feature you have to have).  So as a rule, I always stay on the latest revision of the previous version.  For example, they&amp;#146;re on 6.0(1) now, so I&amp;#146;m running 5.3(2).  When 6.1 comes out, I&amp;#146;ll move to 6.0(last) unless I find reason to move sooner (bugs, features, or security advisories).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 21:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-version-5-2-vs-6-x/m-p/50053#M707814</guid>
      <dc:creator>wdrootz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-09-06T21:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

