<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA NAT Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-nat-question/m-p/3798749#M7084</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm still figuring out NAT in the post 8.2 world. This question is a two parter. First. I have configured SSL VPN and and have the no nat setup like this.....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;nat (inside,outside) source static INTERNAL INTERNAL destination static VPN VPN no-proxy-arp route-lookup&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since INTERNAL and VPN are object groups is static correct here? Or should it be dynamic?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second part is along the same lines. I have other firewalls behind my ASA. For those networks I need to NAT the public IP's to themselves and let them pass to their destination firewall. I THINK I would configure it like this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;object network SUB1
 range 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.250
!
object network SUB2
 range 2.2.2.1 2.2.2.250
!
object-group network ONE-ONE
 network-object object SUB1
network-object object SUB2
!
nat (inside,outside) source static ONE-ONE destination static ONE-ONE&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or would it be like the no nat for vpn and be like this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;nat (inside,outside) source static ONE-ONE ONE-ONE destination static ONE-ONE ONE-ONE&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or am i over thinking this and it really just needs to be?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;object-group network ONE-ONE
nat static ONE-ONE&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cyoung1981</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T16:47:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA NAT Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-nat-question/m-p/3798749#M7084</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm still figuring out NAT in the post 8.2 world. This question is a two parter. First. I have configured SSL VPN and and have the no nat setup like this.....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;nat (inside,outside) source static INTERNAL INTERNAL destination static VPN VPN no-proxy-arp route-lookup&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since INTERNAL and VPN are object groups is static correct here? Or should it be dynamic?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second part is along the same lines. I have other firewalls behind my ASA. For those networks I need to NAT the public IP's to themselves and let them pass to their destination firewall. I THINK I would configure it like this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;object network SUB1
 range 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.250
!
object network SUB2
 range 2.2.2.1 2.2.2.250
!
object-group network ONE-ONE
 network-object object SUB1
network-object object SUB2
!
nat (inside,outside) source static ONE-ONE destination static ONE-ONE&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or would it be like the no nat for vpn and be like this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;nat (inside,outside) source static ONE-ONE ONE-ONE destination static ONE-ONE ONE-ONE&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or am i over thinking this and it really just needs to be?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;object-group network ONE-ONE
nat static ONE-ONE&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-nat-question/m-p/3798749#M7084</guid>
      <dc:creator>cyoung1981</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T16:47:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA NAT Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-nat-question/m-p/3798902#M7087</link>
      <description>You first statement is correct and for 2nd use the same vpn nat&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 05:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-nat-question/m-p/3798902#M7087</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-11T05:36:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA NAT Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-nat-question/m-p/3799309#M7089</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your identity NAT statement (aka no NAT) is correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Second part is along the same lines. I have other firewalls behind my ASA. For those networks I need to NAT the public IP's to themselves and let them pass to their destination firewall. I THINK I would configure it like this?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am not sure I understand what you are trying to achieve here. Are these public IPs configured on the ASAs themselves and are just to be routed through this internet firewall?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:59:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-nat-question/m-p/3799309#M7089</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-11T15:59:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

