<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple ranges in a group in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-ranges-in-a-group/m-p/3800499#M7113</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;i know what you looking for to summarise. But unfortunatly you can not do that. they are different network ranges.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-12T23:29:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple ranges in a group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-ranges-in-a-group/m-p/3800469#M7037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to open up all the ip ranges that Cisco says it needs for webex to talk to my sparkboards.&amp;nbsp; Is there an easy way to create a network object group that has multiple ranges in it?&amp;nbsp; I am running ASA 9.8.2 if that makes a difference.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So for example (that does not work):&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;object-group network Webex&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; network-object range 64.68.96.0 64.68.127.255&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; network-object range 66.114.160.0 66.114.175.255&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; etc....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then in my ACL I can just refer to the group name when opening ports.&amp;nbsp; I'm sure I'm missing something easy, but it has been a long couple of weeks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for any and all ideas.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-ranges-in-a-group/m-p/3800469#M7037</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny Mainprize</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T16:48:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple ranges in a group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-ranges-in-a-group/m-p/3800491#M7107</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How about like this :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;object network webex_1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;subnet&amp;nbsp; 64.68.96.0 &lt;SPAN class="st"&gt;255.255.224.0&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;object network webex_2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;subnet&amp;nbsp; 66.114.160.0 &lt;SPAN class="st"&gt;255.255.224.0&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;object-group network Webex_Group&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;network-object object&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;webex_1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;network-object object&amp;nbsp;webex_2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;here is the big list you need to add for Webex&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://collaborationhelp.cisco.com/article/en-us/WBX264" target="_blank"&gt;https://collaborationhelp.cisco.com/article/en-us/WBX264&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:20:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-ranges-in-a-group/m-p/3800491#M7107</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-12T23:20:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple ranges in a group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-ranges-in-a-group/m-p/3800496#M7111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That very long list is what I was trying to avoid creating a ton of objects for. That is what I was going to do, but I was hoping there would be a better solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:24:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-ranges-in-a-group/m-p/3800496#M7111</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny Mainprize</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-12T23:24:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple ranges in a group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-ranges-in-a-group/m-p/3800499#M7113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i know what you looking for to summarise. But unfortunatly you can not do that. they are different network ranges.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-ranges-in-a-group/m-p/3800499#M7113</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-12T23:29:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

