<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Poor Ethernet Handoff Performance in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370944#M713610</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the scrubbed config as promised.&amp;nbsp; Also, a sh int from the outside interface..&amp;nbsp; Thanks very much for your attention.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:10:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>evoight</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-16T14:10:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poor Ethernet Handoff Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370940#M713558</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a 10x10mb ethernet handoff connected directly to a pix 515(os 8.03 16m flash 128m dram).&amp;nbsp; The performance is really bad on the download side, I'm talking 4.5 to 6mb of 10 on a consistent basis.&amp;nbsp; I know it is the pix because when connected directly to the ethernet handoff with a laptop, the circuit runs 10x10 consistently.&amp;nbsp; Here is another curiosity...&amp;nbsp; The customer has another ethernet handoff from a cable provider that is 15x2, using the same interface on the same pix, I consistently hit within acceptable limits (90-100% of rated speed).&amp;nbsp; I have matched the speed and duplex manually and the port is not reporting any errors, I even matched the mtu for the upstream router, nothing seems to change the performance.&amp;nbsp; I know the pix is old and it will be an ASA 5510 if they can ever be purchased again.&amp;nbsp; I wonder if there is any gotchas in this and the performance with the ASA will stink as well...&amp;nbsp; Does anyone have any ideas/suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:33:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370940#M713558</guid>
      <dc:creator>evoight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T17:33:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor Ethernet Handoff Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370941#M713570</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have perhaps a lot of ACLs configured and inspections that could possibly be affecting performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would not think the PIX itself is presenting problems (since another connection through it works fine).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One possibility is that between those two interfaces, there are lots of configuration issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you post the configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Federico.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:52:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370941#M713570</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Coto Fajardo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-15T20:52:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor Ethernet Handoff Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370942#M713584</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Between which two interfaces?&amp;nbsp; I actually have less acl entries than when it was running on the 15x2 circuit.&amp;nbsp; I will scrub and post the config tomorrow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370942#M713584</guid>
      <dc:creator>evoight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-15T21:05:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor Ethernet Handoff Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370943#M713601</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You mentioned that the download speed is very bad through the PIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, you're downloading from one side to the outside side of the PIX (these two interfaces).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There could be configuration causing this problem but is just a possibility.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps you're having other issues with the device itself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Federico.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:12:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370943#M713601</guid>
      <dc:creator>Federico Coto Fajardo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-15T21:12:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor Ethernet Handoff Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370944#M713610</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the scrubbed config as promised.&amp;nbsp; Also, a sh int from the outside interface..&amp;nbsp; Thanks very much for your attention.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:10:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/poor-ethernet-handoff-performance/m-p/1370944#M713610</guid>
      <dc:creator>evoight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-16T14:10:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

